|
[Sponsors] |
2D vs 3D model, Eulerian vs Particle tracking |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 10, 2008, 06:04 |
2D vs 3D model, Eulerian vs Particle tracking
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi CFD guys,
I'm modeling two-phase flow in a pipe. Are the results of 2D axisymmetric(x & y axis,1 element thick) and 3D simulations should be comparably the same for well converged solutions? If not can I conclude that the reason for the difference is that the values in the 3rd axis (e.g. z axis) are significant? Another thing, should I expect that the results of Eulerian-Eulerian and Particle tracking are comparably the same for accurate solutions? I don't know if these are non-sense questions but please help me. Thanks guys! Itchie |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seeking Macroscopic Particle Model in Fluent | bzhang7 | FLUENT | 3 | June 25, 2022 18:54 |
Macroscopic particle model | sbiswas12000@yahoo.com | Main CFD Forum | 1 | October 26, 2017 04:57 |
Particle tracking in Mixing tank | zhang.limin | FLUENT | 0 | November 12, 2010 21:23 |
Cavitation and Particle Tracking | Jinx | CFX | 0 | April 15, 2009 07:28 |
particle tracking | Gab | CFX | 0 | January 5, 2006 17:12 |