|
[Sponsors] |
April 1, 2008, 16:03 |
FLUENT or CFX
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello, I have been assigned to do CFD modelling for burners. That could include detailed reaction mechanisms. Can anyone explain or recommend which package I should get. CFX or FLUENT? and why.. Thank you, John
|
|
April 1, 2008, 18:31 |
Re: FLUENT or CFX
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I have no idea about Fluent but CFX should have the capability to do this. Also check out the CFX-RIF flamelet library. Arrange a trial of both packages and see which one works best for what you are doing - although it will be a lot of work getting an accurate simulation so you will need help from CFX support to do a sensible comparison in the trial time. Glenn Horrocks |
|
April 5, 2008, 07:33 |
Re: FLUENT or CFX
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i also told fluent is better one ok bye
|
|
April 5, 2008, 12:46 |
Re: FLUENT or CFX
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have been heard about fluent is appropriated for combustion, but i am not sure about it!
|
|
April 8, 2008, 05:53 |
Re: FLUENT or CFX
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Both codes are essentially equal in this regard and can simulate your problem.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mesh and Solve Times for CFX, Fluent, CD-adapco | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 28, 2012 03:54 |
Import CFX def into Fluent | eric_wang | FLUENT | 0 | April 18, 2011 14:14 |
OpenFOAM vs. Fluent & CFX | marco | Main CFD Forum | 81 | March 31, 2009 15:22 |
Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure | Omer | CFX | 9 | June 28, 2007 05:13 |
Jobs in cfd - fluent or cfx? | jobman | Main CFD Forum | 6 | July 5, 2006 16:02 |