|
[Sponsors] |
March 28, 2008, 11:52 |
Yplus checking
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
Ive been running a simulation with K epsilon turbulence model and hence in cfx mesh have been defining an first layer thickness for inflation layer with a Yplus of 20 as it says in cfx help. When i plot a graph in post processing of Yplus vs x distance around the inflation layer (its a flat plate) most of the graph is above 20 on the upper surface but at the tip and tail the vlaue goes as low as 2. Id say about 85 % was above 15. How can i change this or this acceptable? Im using 10 layers of inflation but due to aspect ratios and setting the internal angle to 15deg there is only 3-4 layers at the tips/tail Thnaks Steven |
|
March 30, 2008, 18:55 |
Re: Yplus checking
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
If you use the SST turbulence model then you can use automatic wall functions and therefore the range of y+ would be fine. Whether the y+ range you have with a k-eps model is a problem depends on the simulation. You will need to do a validation study to find out. Glenn Horrocks |
|
April 7, 2008, 09:29 |
Re: Yplus checking
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Also, your y+ value is heavily dependent upon your local Reynolds number, so in areas with stagnated flow such as the leading edge, your y+ will automatically decrease
Adam |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
critical error during installation of openfoam | Fabio88 | OpenFOAM Installation | 21 | June 2, 2010 04:01 |
Problems in compiling paraview in Suse 10.3 platform | chiven | OpenFOAM Installation | 3 | December 1, 2009 08:21 |
OpenFOAM installation problem on Linux 32bit | kumar | OpenFOAM Installation | 0 | April 27, 2007 06:41 |
Help%7e%7einstall openfoam13 on fc5%7e%7e | aderliner | OpenFOAM Installation | 2 | September 11, 2006 08:24 |
Gerris software installation | mer | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 12, 2005 09:50 |