CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Displacement Combustion in cfx

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 27, 2023, 08:59
Default Displacement Combustion in cfx
  #1
Senior Member
 
Mey
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 7
MNMK is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I would like to cause a delay in my combustion. I know through the Combution Model (Eddy Dissipation), when the air and gas meet each other automatically, the combustion happens. And there is also a possibility, through the Extinction Temperature temperature, to prevent combustion beyond the specific temperature.

What is another possibility to shift the combustion?

For example, 2 cm above the surface of the burner.

regards,
MNMK is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2023, 09:10
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,929
Rep Power: 28
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
You can create a volume above the burner and turn off combustion there. In Pre, I expect you need to select the option "Disable Constant Physics".

It however looks like a weird work around to get matching results. What are you trying to achieve?
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2023, 09:18
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Mey
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 7
MNMK is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gert-Jan View Post
You can create a volume above the burner and turn of combustion there. In Pre, I expect you need to select the option "Disable Constant Physics".

It however looks like a weird work around to get matching results. What are you trying to achieve?

I would like to simulate a combution but through experience I know the ignition happen 2 cm above the sieve of the burnner.

I hope there is a way to model it.

tanx
MNMK is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 28, 2023, 00:23
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,872
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
It is much better to generate flow conditions and physics such that the flame ends up where it is meant to be, rather than having inaccurate flow and physics which then require you to force the flame to be in the correct location.

In other words - if the flame is in the wrong location then your simulation is inaccurate and you should fix the inaccuracy. When your simulation is accurate then the flame will be in the right spot all by itself.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2023, 03:49
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Mey
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 116
Rep Power: 7
MNMK is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
It is much better to generate flow conditions and physics such that the flame ends up where it is meant to be, rather than having inaccurate flow and physics which then require you to force the flame to be in the correct location.

In other words - if the flame is in the wrong location then your simulation is inaccurate and you should fix the inaccuracy. When your simulation is accurate then the flame will be in the right spot all by itself.
Hello Ghorrocks,

I am not sure that I got your meaning. However, when the combustion is fully mixed, by the simulation of Eddy Dissipation Model, when the air and gas meet each other, they start burning.

It means that an igniter is not necessary.


regards,
MNMK is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2023, 05:54
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,872
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
I do not understand what you are saying, or what you are trying to do. Can you explain what you are trying to do, what you are currently getting and what you want to get with your simulation? Also include details of your simulation - the output file would be good.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Adding materials like COS,CS2 in CFX for combustion adityadukre99 CFX 1 August 2, 2023 21:45
Fluent Meshing for CFX opinions siw CFX 1 April 25, 2022 07:55
Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL Val Main CFD Forum 3 June 10, 2011 03:20
Combustion in CFX bharath CFX 2 December 2, 2008 08:37
LES of Non-Premixed Combustion in CFX?? Manu CFX 5 February 25, 2008 17:34


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:31.