|
[Sponsors] |
January 2, 2008, 19:52 |
Number of elements in a mesh insignificant?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I think CFX creates a control volume for each node in the mesh and each CV has few integration points (I guess 3 ?) in it to perform the calculations. So does the number of elements in a mesh become insignificant? Thanks, Sam |
|
January 4, 2008, 13:04 |
Re: Number of elements in a mesh insignificant?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
CFX does create a control volume for each node, but the number of integration points will depend on the number of elements connected to that node. For a node on a typical hex element, there are 24 integration points. For a node on a typical tet, there are about 60. The details are covered in the Theory documentation under Discretization.
The number of nodes determines the number of equations to solve, and hence the performance of the linear solver and the number of elements affect the equation assembly, so both will affect the memory usage and time per iteration. -CycLone |
|
January 4, 2008, 13:51 |
Re: Number of elements in a mesh insignificant?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you very much CycLone ! You reply helped a lot. It would be great if you can help me with my another doubt which I posted at the following thread . Thanks a ton in advance !
http://www.cfd-online.com/Forum/cfx.cgi?read=24062 -Sam |
|
January 6, 2008, 20:51 |
Re: Number of elements in a mesh insignificant?---
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Done.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gambit problems | Althea | FLUENT | 22 | January 4, 2017 04:19 |
[ICEM] Generating Mesh for STL Car in Windtunnel Simulation | tommymoose | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 48 | April 15, 2013 05:24 |
[snappyHexMesh] non-smooth mesh | Svensson | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | January 18, 2012 10:13 |
[blockMesh] BlockMeshmergePatchPairs | hjasak | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | August 15, 2008 08:36 |
Penetrating elements in extruded mesh | Michael P | CFX | 2 | May 20, 2005 09:06 |