|
[Sponsors] |
August 6, 2007, 14:47 |
CFX Solver error: floation point exception
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, After 4 iterations in my simulation, the CFX11-Solver throws the following error. I am unable to understand it. I will highly appreciate if some one can help me out.
Thanks, Kushagra. ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. | | Message: | | c_fpx_handler: Floating point exception: Overflow |
|
August 6, 2007, 19:22 |
Re: CFX Solver error: floation point exception
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Read the documentation - "obtaining convergence" Glenn Horrocks |
|
August 6, 2007, 23:29 |
Re: CFX Solver error: floation point exception
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Glenn,
Thank you very much for your help. The document says that the solver failure could mean that non-physical boundary condition or initial values were applied. I was trying to see the effect of restitution coefficient in 2-phase (liquid-solid) Eulerian-Eulerian simulation. And I see that the floating point exception error is thrown until the restitution coefficient is lowered than 0.9 Is the restitution coefficient greater than 0.9 not feasible? Could you please help with your valuable suggestions. I am very new in the CFD world. Many Thanks, Kushagra Mittal. |
|
August 8, 2007, 07:57 |
Re: CFX Solver error: floation point exception
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
You would imagine particles with such high restitution factors would bounce around like billard balls, this sounds difficult to converge to me. A solver overflow is one type of convergence failure. Glenn Horrocks |
|
January 10, 2013, 07:46 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 173
Rep Power: 15 |
As I just noticed this error is not solely due to a too big time step. It also occurs when using only "single precision" instead of "double precision override" option. With single precision the possible time steps are a lot smaller than those you can use with double precision while still getting convergence.
At least my overflow problem has just been solved by switching from single to double precision. |
|
January 12, 2013, 16:27 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,872
Rep Power: 144 |
Yes, that's why double precision is listed as one thing to try on the FAQ: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...gence_criteria
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Floating point exception error with small DeltaT | rassilon | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 19 | September 2, 2009 08:39 |
why the solver reject it? Anyone with experience? | bearcat | CFX | 6 | April 28, 2008 15:08 |
CFX Solver Memory Error | mike | CFX | 1 | March 19, 2008 08:22 |
[Gmsh] Gmsh and samplesurface | touf | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | December 10, 2007 03:27 |
CFX 5.5 | Roued | CFX | 1 | October 2, 2001 17:49 |