|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi everyone!
In cfx, I created an additonal variable as a gas A and set it as transport equation. The main purpose of the simulation is to see the additional variable distribution in the room, but now I am confused with the boundary contition. The gas A is injected from the bottom of the room. At the beginning, I set it as an inlet boundary, but it seemed that I have to set the air velocity and there is no air to be injected in from the surface of the bottom in the room. Would you please tell me how I should set it in CFX? May I use wall boundary and then set boundary sources? Or set a subdomain and set a source with the equation of gas A? Actually I don't think adding source is a good idea according to my understanding of the sources. Any comments will be appreciate, thank you very much! Regards Li |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Li,
The boundary condition types (inlet, outlet, etc) refer to how the hydrodynamics are treated, not additional variables. If the AV originates at a wall, make it a wall and specify the additional variable value or flux. If it originates within a volume region, create a subdomain and introduce an AV source. If it originates from a point source (or a region smaller than your mesh resolution), create a point source. Regards, Robin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hej Robin, thank you so much for your comments! I will try to set a wall and specify the AV flux first. Then I will come back to tell you if it works. Thanks a lot!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Would you please tell me the difference between specifying AV 'flux in' and boundary source of AV equation sources in wall boundary condition? I read the help documents, but I still don't understand them well. Thank you!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Interesting question. I'm not sure if there is a difference.
Opaque, can you answer this? -Robin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Li,
For laminar flows, there is no difference between using a boundary source, or Flux in. However, for turbulent flows the value of the AV at the boundary is extracted from the "boundary layer/wall function" approximation when the Flux in option is used. That is not done for boundary source since a source is independent of the boundary layer behavior.. I think I did explain similar issue for heat transfer in a different thread. Hope this helps, Opaque |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hej Opaque,
Thank you very much! It does help me a lot. I will search the thread you mentioned since I concern it too. At the same time, I am wondering if I could find this information you told me from the relative papers or CFD theory books or CFX help documents? Thanks a lot! With kind regards Li |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Li,
You are welcome. Search the CFX Solver Theory documentation for "Heat Flux in the Near-Wall Region".. That explains the heat transfer case, and the additional variable case is just similar to it. Opaque |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks a lot!
With kind regards Li |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mesh file for flow over a circular cylinder | Ardalan | Main CFD Forum | 7 | December 15, 2020 13:06 |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 03:32 |
OpenFOAM Variable Velocity Boundary Conditions | NickolasPl | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 2 | May 19, 2011 05:37 |
[Netgen] boundary conditions and mesh exporting | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | May 27, 2010 09:38 |
Concentric tube heat exchanger (Air-Water) | Young | CFX | 5 | October 6, 2008 23:17 |