|
[Sponsors] |
Stage interface - circumferentially uniform pressure? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 26, 2022, 07:27 |
Stage interface - circumferentially uniform pressure?
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 |
Hello all,
I'm doing multistage axial compressor in CFX (version 2019R2). Using default "Stage" interface settings, which says "Mixing plane" and I don't activate the "Implicit Stage Averaging". I always thought, that the way, Stage interface works is that it takes a circumferential band on a certain radius, averages the value and then passes it to the next passage with respect to rotating/stationary frame conversion. So, the inlet profile for the consequent blade row should be circumferentially uniform? Unfortunately, I don't see it in my compressor, and for right or wrong reason, my total pressure is larger at the suction side of the blade (see the attachment). And the variability is about 20% of the pressure rise. I've checked the plots of P0 at the stator inlet - it seems like a potential flow field from the stator leading edges is propagating upstream (see the attachment). The axial gaps between rotors and stators are quite short, and the LE potential field would expand much further away, I suppose. Any ideas whether it is a right thing to happen (I mean, the circumferential non-uniformity at the second side of the Stage interface)? In my project I consider local values of the flow in proximity to the stator, so for me this uniformity (or not) is crucial. Thank you |
|
April 27, 2022, 09:51 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,873
Rep Power: 33 |
For the default settings (constant total pressure in the relative frame if I recall correctly, it is a total pressure constrain, not a static pressure constrain.
perhaps worth a look at that variable in the post-processor. On the implicit stage averaging, it is a setting to improve convergence for cases with mild recirculation regions, and it should not change a converged solution in any way or form.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
April 27, 2022, 10:01 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 |
Quote:
The plot shows Total pressure indeed, not the static one. I would accept that the static one is variable. I attach all the interfaces here - they all had default settings, and all the plots are total pressures, and they are all different... |
||
April 27, 2022, 10:11 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,873
Rep Power: 33 |
You have 3 different total pressures:
1 - Total Pressure in Stn Frame 2 - Total Pressure in Rel Frame 3 - Total Pressure which of the 3 did you compare? Only one can be maintained constant, please read the documentation for the details
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
April 27, 2022, 11:46 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 |
Quote:
Stator 1 sees the LE pressure field (as on the very first picture), and stator 2 has uniformed flow. But all the interfaces were made default. |
||
Tags |
circumferential average, rotor stator interface, stage interface |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
viscosity udf don't use correct temperature and strain rate | rezvani | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 8 | May 27, 2021 06:40 |
Error - Solar absorber - Solar Thermal Radiation | MichaelK | CFX | 12 | September 1, 2016 06:15 |
Setting rotating frame of referece. | RPFigueiredo | CFX | 3 | October 28, 2014 05:59 |
Error finding variable "THERMX" | sunilpatil | CFX | 8 | April 26, 2013 08:00 |
RasInterFoam STRANGE RESULTS AT BOUNDARY | kumar2 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | March 24, 2008 19:38 |