|
[Sponsors] |
June 11, 2007, 07:09 |
AMD 64 FX-series Windsor
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi All,
did anyone test the AMD 64 FX-7series (Windsor)? According to the site http://www23.tomshardware.com/ this series shows the best performance on floating point operations. It is three times as fast as the Core2duo conroe. Gert-Jan |
|
June 11, 2007, 07:20 |
Re: AMD 64 FX-series Windsor
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"It is three times as fast as the Core2duo conroe."
Bullshit. Its just a standard K8 style core. You can easily judge/scale their relative performance from: http://www.fluent.com/software/fluen...lems/fl5lc.htm That chip is equivalent to an Opteron core ... just look for an appropriate clock speed in the benchmark data. Then compare it too a 3 GHZ Woodcrest core. |
|
June 11, 2007, 09:30 |
Re: AMD 64 FX-series Windsor
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Joe,
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I was looking to the memory floating points. It is better to look to the CPU speed. Gert-Jan |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 05:36 |
AMD Barcelona | Aero75 | CFX | 12 | April 14, 2008 18:28 |
OpenFOAM 13 AMD quadcore parallel results | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | November 10, 2007 23:23 |
Core 2 Duo or AMD X2 | philippose | OpenFOAM | 9 | August 13, 2007 12:23 |
CFX 5.7 on P4 2.4 and AMD Athlon 64 3000+ | Dmitry Korshun | CFX | 4 | November 28, 2004 10:45 |