 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
May 3, 2007, 13:06
|
CFX.. win 32 (xp prof) vs. linux (suse10.2)
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello. Does anybody knows in what operating system, does ansys CFX (and other products: TurboGrid, Workbench...) works faster??
faster means = time solving a CFD problem. For example, if you run the SAME problem in linux and in windows.... in wich OS (operating system) runs faster ?? Thanks. Santiago. |
|
|
||
|
May 3, 2007, 19:47
|
Re: CFX.. win 32 (xp prof) vs. linux (suse10.2)
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am a XP man through and through, but I believe that the solver actually runs faster on linux based systems. There are a few threads on this subject in this forum and the official forum.
Stu |
|
|
|
||
|
May 4, 2007, 18:05
|
Re: CFX.. win 32 (xp prof) vs. linux (suse10.2)
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Based on my experience I would say that there is hardly any difference. Most important is the speed of your processor. A small difference I noticed is that in linux the file handling is faster. E.g. Results files are created faster.
Gert-Jan |
|
|
|
||
|
May 6, 2007, 20:37
|
Re: CFX.. win 32 (xp prof) vs. linux (suse10.2)
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I agree with Gert-Jan, recent versions of CFX run about the same speed on WinXP and linux, both serial and parallel. I have not seen benchmarks of CFX11 yet but certainly for CFX10 there was no difference. Glenn Horrocks |
|
|
|
||
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CFX parallel Computing under linux OS | superqtp | CFX | 5 | July 5, 2011 01:04 |
| Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL | Val | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 10, 2011 03:20 |
| CFX pressure in Simulations problem | nasdak | CFX | 1 | April 14, 2010 14:22 |
| CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 05:07 |
| CFX, NT parallel, Linux, best platform | Heiko Gerhauser | CFX | 1 | August 21, 2001 10:46 |
Linear Mode
