|
[Sponsors] |
when should we change max continuity loop number |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 1, 2007, 16:03 |
when should we change max continuity loop number
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi,
Sometimes in my compressible fluid CFX10 simulations, I got msg reminding the max mach number and recommending changing max continuity loop number to 2. I am wondering, is this a number we SHOULD change to 2 if we run high speed fluid simulations or this is optional unless we have some trouble to get runs converged? And why CFX thinks there is something wrong in my simulations and give this message? thanks a lot |
|
March 1, 2007, 17:05 |
Re: when should we change max continuity loop numb
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
It is optional and it does not always help in simulations where it recommends to do it. Try it in your simulation and see if it helps or not. Glenn Horrocks |
|
March 7, 2007, 12:58 |
Re: when should we change max continuity loop numb
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It is generally recomended for cases with high Mach numbers and shocks where convergence might otherwise be difficult. As Glenn says, it doesn't always help, but if your case really does have shocks (as opposed to just bad initial conditions or unphysical boundary conditions) it probably will help.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transient simulation not converging | skabilan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | December 17, 2019 00:12 |
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 | bookie56 | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | August 13, 2011 05:03 |
DecomposePar unequal number of shared faces | maka | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 6 | August 12, 2010 10:01 |
Unaligned accesses on IA64 | andre | OpenFOAM | 5 | June 23, 2008 11:37 |
Modeling in micron scale using icoFoam | m9819348 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | October 27, 2007 01:36 |