|
[Sponsors] |
February 13, 2007, 18:02 |
Shared license fluent/cfx
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
it is possible that fluent/cfx share the same annual license. For example if I want to work 3 days wit fluent then 4 days with CFX during a week.
how do you set it up? thanks |
|
February 14, 2007, 11:06 |
Re: Shared license fluent/cfx
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
My understanding is that you would have to buy both CFX and Fluent licenses. There is no sharing of licenses.
|
|
February 14, 2007, 14:39 |
Re: Shared license fluent/cfx
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In the future it will be possible to either choose a Fluent or a CFX solver. The questions are: when and at what price.......
Astrid |
|
February 18, 2007, 09:01 |
Re: Shared license fluent/cfx
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
this is runbbish, I only want to pay according to my usage. Ansys should get their act together
|
|
February 19, 2007, 18:11 |
Re: Shared license fluent/cfx
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
ANSYS has it's act together and is going to implement this.
Unfortunately such a change can only happen when a major release happens and there was no time to do this for 11.0. Should be available for the 11.0 service pack. |
|
February 20, 2007, 21:56 |
Re: Shared license fluent/cfx
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Heck...
sorry man (or woman ;-)) but....read your own words.... it was over 1 year ago now that deal was made public... Not enough time..that is "having your act together"!!! .and the answer is going to be a service pack...come on ....talk about complete lack of customer focus!!! This sounds a lot like the day Ansys eliminated CFX-build on new-years day...because it was not in Ansys's best interest! There are a lot of users paying a lot of money and are looking for a plan.... Here are some tips on the issues...just for your managament....no charge this time...LOL - so we get this service pack....then what about support and training....??? - what about pricing issues.... say I paid x dollars for a cfx license and fluent was 1.2 x....then joe (or Joanne...;-))down the steet paid 20% less than me but is running the same solvers? - long term what is the solver going to look like....I would like to start doing work that will still be backward compatable in 3 years! It looks like it is time for some fast and flexible competition to move in! Get your act together for real for next time. Regards, Bak_Flow |
|
February 21, 2007, 06:06 |
Re: Shared license fluent/cfx
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
This sounds a lot like the day Ansys eliminated CFX-build on new-years day...because it was not in Ansys's best interest!
it seems ansys has decided to stop developing gambit. I do not know hat will happen to this little software. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
License Error | lffabiani | CFX | 2 | June 30, 2011 21:51 |
CFX11 + Fortran compiler ? | Mohan | CFX | 20 | March 30, 2011 19:56 |
DecomposePar unequal number of shared faces | maka | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 6 | August 12, 2010 10:01 |
OpenFOAM141dev linking error on IBM AIX 52 | matthias | OpenFOAM Installation | 24 | April 28, 2008 16:49 |
Shared License Fluent/CFX | Harry | FLUENT | 0 | January 26, 2008 20:00 |