CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

meshing a Naca 4412 airfoil - help

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 14, 2006, 20:26
Default meshing a Naca 4412 airfoil - help
  #1
Santiago Orrego.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hello. Im analysing a Naca4412, and I need some recomendations of the way that I should mesh the rectangle that contains the airfoil (low Re). 1. What kind of face Spacing? (Angular, relative error, constant, volumen spacing ?) 2. If I should create a new Face Space, and refine the mesh around the airfoil or create a control point and refine the mesh ? 3. how can I change the type of the element? and know the dimension, so I can extrude the 2D shape? 4. How many layers in Inflation? what configuration in teh inflation?

Thanks in advanced Santiago.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 2006, 17:37
Default Re: meshing a Naca 4412 airfoil - help
  #2
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

These parameters depend on many things. Some things to consider are:
  1. <LI>What Re number? <LI>Is transition important? <LI>Is the foil stalling? <LI>Do you want transient results? <LI>Do you want accurate drag numbers or just the lift? <LI>Any any 3D effects eg wing tips?

These parameters affect both the choice of physics to model and the mesh.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 2006, 22:05
Default Re: meshing a Naca 4412 airfoil - help
  #3
Santiago Orrego.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
1. Re=400.000

2. yes.

3. no.

4. no.

5. both.

6. not yet.

Do you have a tutorial or paper that specify what kind of mesh do I need? or some kind o guidance? Thanks a lot santiago.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2006, 05:42
Default Re: meshing a Naca 4412 airfoil - help
  #4
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

In that case you really only have one option which is to use the transition model in CFX. That has the following implications:
  • <LI>You need the SST turbulence model with the transition model extensions. <LI>You need to have a mesh with a y+<=1, but not too small. <LI>Use either a hex mesh or inflation layers ensuring any transition to tets occurs well outside the boundary layer, including any transition induced separations. <LI>The maximum expansion ratio in the inflation layers is problem dependant, but the transitional turbulence model is a bit sensitive to expansion ratios above 1.05 (definitely) or 1.02 (sometimes). <LI>At this Re number the transition is likely to occur in the front half of the foil (unless this is a laminar flow airfoil) so make sure this region is well resolved. <LI>You will need a mesh fine enough to resolve the curvature at the front accurately <LI>It will be very sensitive to upstream turbulence conditions and possibly blockage factor as well <LI>It will also be sensitive to foil surface condition. You may need to artificially trip the turbulence at the correct spot.

Hope that helps. I think you will find some validation examples of the transitional turbulence model on the CFX-community website. If not your CFX support person should have some.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Other] Ansys meshing airfoil and / or compressor blades baw192 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 8 September 23, 2011 01:43
Gambit - meshing over airfoil wrapping (?) problem JFDC FLUENT 1 July 11, 2011 06:59
[mesh tool] meshing airfoil naca 0015 peter pan ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 June 15, 2011 10:26
[GAMBIT] Meshing airfoil using .dat file problem creggie ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 10 June 27, 2010 20:24
Moving Mesh on 3D Airfoil NACA 4412 nuovodna OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 January 3, 2008 12:03


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:47.