|
[Sponsors] |
October 23, 2006, 22:31 |
Re: please ignore last posting
|
#21 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You need to validate your results. CFD has not yet reached the stage that it can be used solely without validation. Tet+prism is not really bad in all cases. It's problem dependent. I did see some authors getting a good result using tet+prism mesh in their flow problems.
|
|
October 24, 2006, 09:06 |
Re: Difference between Hex and Tetra in CFX
|
#22 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi TB,
I don't disagree with you and never said that unstructured meshes should be used whenever possible. Actually, if anything I would state the opposite, that whenever <bi>possible</bi> you should use a hex mesh. The point is not to bend over backwards to get a mesh of a particular type (or to avoid another). The main objective should be to get a mesh with appropriate resolution and validate your application accordingly. Regards, Robin |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Combining Hex and Tetra Mesh | ZenCef | ANSYS | 7 | November 10, 2011 06:04 |
[ANSYS Meshing] Meshing in CFX | zephyrus17 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | October 5, 2011 22:14 |
Urban scenario - tetra vs hex problem | pablocg | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | April 9, 2009 04:14 |
Octree Vs Advancing Front tetra meshing techniques | Sam | CFX | 4 | February 18, 2008 09:54 |
Difference in Hex and Tet mesh | san | FLUENT | 2 | May 11, 2006 07:13 |