CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Physical timestep Calculation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 4, 2006, 12:09
Default Physical timestep Calculation
  #1
Joe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am making a simulation of a wigley hull, involving a free surface between air and water. While trying to make the simulation, I defined the physical timestep as in the CFX manual but it doesnt seem to work.

A wall is positioned at the outlet and an irregular flow is also seen there. By inputting a smaller timescale the simulation progresses kind of better but still there is a problem.

The size of the domain is big enough for the simulation to take place without any problem but i think the timescale is not correct.

Can someone tell me a way to calculate the timescale?

Regards Joe

  Reply With Quote

Old   July 4, 2006, 12:16
Default Re: Physical timestep Calculation
  #2
Joe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Read the Best Practices Guide for Multiphase flow in the manual appendix.
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 4, 2006, 14:31
Default Re: Physical timestep Calculation
  #3
James Date
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Have you tried running a steady state simulation yet? You should get a converged solution using this method. If you do run the transient case, make sure the time step satisfies the Courant requirement being < 1, based on the wave speed. Info about this can be found in the CFX manual. If you are using CFX-10, download the latest CFX-11 preview from www.ansys.com because it has improved numerics which help to reduce the spurious waves which can occur in the far field when using CFX-10. Are you validating your Wigley results against those obtained by Tokyo University in their tank tests?

James

  Reply With Quote

Old   July 4, 2006, 16:07
Default Re: Physical timestep Calculation
  #4
Joe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am running steady state simulation with CFX 5.7. Some results showed me good approximations with the experimental even though the simulation did not completely converge.

  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 06:36
How to interrupt unsteady calculation and carry on without timestep increase? aleisia FLUENT 1 March 19, 2011 00:02
Different Physical timestep for different domain new@cfx CFX 0 September 6, 2005 11:53
Warning 097- AB Siemens 6 November 15, 2004 05:41
Physical Timestep Ted Crilly Siemens 2 February 18, 2003 05:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:03.