|
[Sponsors] |
August 30, 2009, 08:23 |
|
#21 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
||
April 23, 2010, 04:36 |
|
#22 | |
New Member
yashwant
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
hi sir, can u send me the boundary conditions which u applied in cfx so i can try the solution in cfx too. |
||
April 16, 2011, 01:31 |
|
#23 | |
Senior Member
mohammad
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 245
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Although the original thread looks outdated, but when I read your answer and Suraj's reasons, I became confused that Suraj is right somewhat, and you 100%. Because the blades will be equally loaded in axial steady case ,but the points that Suraj says also make sense. Do you have any solution for this contradiction or you just say"REGARDLESS" what the real/theoretical results are... it will be "n" times the results of single blade. Then, if you confirm the previous answer what is the cause of this HUGE difference between this two...? and PLZ remember than Suraj's points are in contradiction with energy conservation law... TNX |
||
April 16, 2011, 08:34 |
|
#24 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
My point was simply that for even blade loading, each blade supplies 1/n of the torque. I said nothing about how much extra torque you get by adding more blades. That is a different question so don't get confused.
|
|
October 7, 2013, 14:54 |
5 MW offshore wind turbine
|
#25 |
New Member
sattar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi for all
I am trying to simulate 5 MW offshore wind turbine (aerodynamics study only) using CFX to validate my results which were coming from another solver, under these conditions · Full scale of 5 MW offshore wind turbine dimensions · transient analysis · Inlet velocity = 9 m/sec · 3 blade rotor + hub (rotating domain) with angular velocity =1.08 rad/sec · Nacelle + tower (stationary domain) · Then, three interfaces have been defined between the stationary domain and the rotating domain due to changes in reference frames. In order to rotate the rotor in ANSYS. · I create appropriate and suitable meshes for all the parts in ICEM and CFX is specifying domains, boundary conditions, type of analysis, interfaces, etc. But I always I find this error First side of interface | | Domain Interface 1 | | seems to contain a vertex at R=0 (Rmin/Rrange < GGI ETA TOLERANCE).| | This is not supported with | | PITCH CHANGE/Option = Automatic | | Please use | | PITCH CHANGE/Option = None | | instead. | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | ********* WARNING ********* | | Coordinate transformation of interface | | Domain Interface 2 | | into a radial interface resulted in some faces with a very small | | axial extent. There are two possible reasons for this: | | 1. The interface contains axial faces (normal to the axis). | | If this is the case, please split the interface into two parts, | | so that the purely axial sections could be transformed | | properly. The transformation type (axial or radial) is chosen | | automatically based on the largest interface extent. | | 2. This message may be generated because of a tolerancing issue | | when the mesh resolution in the axial direction is very | | small (e.g. at the hub or shroud). If this is the case, you | | may ignore this message. | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. | | Message: | | ****** FATAL ERROR ****** The orthographic view transformation fa- | | iled on domain interface "Domain Interface 2". Failure may be du- | | e to r=0 included in transformed cylindrical coordinates of an in- | | terface with rotational relative motion. Another reason could be | | that the interface contains faces that are parallel and others t- | | hat are perpendicular to the rotation axis. | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ </SPAN> When I selected (PITCH CHANGE/Option = Automatic ) which I thought is correct chose but the above error will appear And when I selected (PITCH CHANGE/Option = None) the run continue and complete, everything is ok, but the values of torque is negative ???? thanks |
|
October 7, 2013, 18:42 |
|
#26 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
It looks like you are modelling the whole thing so you are correct to use pitch change=none. As for the negative torque, have you checked the vector direction of the torque?
|
|
October 7, 2013, 18:55 |
|
#27 |
New Member
sattar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 14 |
hi
do you means that, by using the right hand rule can i find the torque direction thanks |
|
October 7, 2013, 19:08 |
|
#28 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Just had a look at the torque function in the CFX reference manual. If you use the torque_x, torque_y, torque_z functions it returns the torque about the X, Y and Z coordinate axis respectively (and yes you can use the RH rule to get the direction). But the axis specification is optional and it is not clear what axis it uses if you just use the torque function with no axis defined.
Does anybody know what axis the torque function uses if no axis is defined? To get around this I would just use the torque_x/y/z functions so you know exactly what axis it is using. |
|
October 8, 2013, 06:45 |
|
#29 |
New Member
sattar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 14 |
thanks for your answer
but I calculate the torque of the rotor on the rotation axis torque_x()@BLADE +torque_x()@BLADE1 +torque_x()@BLADE2 which appear for me negative despite of the rotation of the blades counter-clockwise |
|
October 8, 2013, 06:48 |
|
#30 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
To get the correct result in a rotating machine simulation, you need to not only get the numerics correct, but you also need to get the operating point correct. This means that the rotation speed might be a little faster or slower.
So negative torque means the rotation speed is slower - assuming your simulation is accurate. |
|
October 8, 2013, 07:55 |
|
#31 |
New Member
sattar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 14 |
can I give a negative value for the rotation speed
for the rotational domain and I checked some of paper that use the same rotational speed with the same dimension of my wind turbine and got a positive value of torque |
|
October 8, 2013, 08:45 |
|
#32 |
Senior Member
mohammad
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 245
Rep Power: 16 |
||
October 8, 2013, 08:53 |
|
#33 |
New Member
sattar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 14 |
thanks again you are so helpful
and I will try to do simulation with -1.08 rad/s |
|
October 16, 2014, 04:08 |
3 d simulation of helicel turbine in cfx
|
#34 |
New Member
rajendra singh
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 13 |
hi,
i m trying to simulate a helical turbine but i only know the inlet velocity.so how to perform transient analysis? of it.Do i need to take two domain one stationary and one rotating?plz suggest something |
|
October 16, 2014, 06:27 |
|
#35 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
You will need to know a pressure somewhere to set the pressure level.
Look at the CFX tutorials for how to run simulations. And in future, if you have a new question start a new thread rather than hijacking an old thread. |
|
February 1, 2016, 08:51 |
inquiry about wind power using ansys fluent 15
|
#36 |
New Member
hossam elbakry
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
hello,
i am using fluent 15, after i draw the horizontal turbine using solidworks, i made a run of fluent with omega and input wind speed, using k-omega sst model, the resultant torque multiplied with the omega to get the power. the question is: the calculated power using ansys can be compared with the net power of commercial turbine directly, " or should be multiplied to rotor efficiency first before comparing with net power of commercial turbine? |
|
February 1, 2016, 16:54 |
|
#37 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
The power at the rotor shaft (torque x omega) should match the torque at the rotor shaft of the turbine.
|
|
February 1, 2016, 17:59 |
|
#38 |
New Member
hossam elbakry
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
but i am not comparing with torque at the rotor shaft of the turbine,,,
i am comparing power from ansys ( omega x torque) with the net producing power from the generator where the commercial turbine connected to. so i think that a parameter of efficiency of rotor and generator and inverter should be included. |
|
February 1, 2016, 18:35 |
|
#39 |
New Member
|
You can only compare the CFD computed rotor power to the rotor power of the real machine. If it's not possible to find the real rotor's power, you may need to find it by either experiment (if it's possible) or by asking the manufacturer.
If you know the efficiency of the generator, etc, you should try to use it to make an approximation of the net aerodynamic rotor power.
__________________
-- Kyriakos Vafiadis Mechanical Engineer, PhD candidate |
|
February 1, 2016, 19:56 |
|
#40 |
New Member
hossam elbakry
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11 |
you are correct,,,i am trying to compare the ansys power (torque x omega) with the generator power ,,,,but i think the rotor efficicency and inverter efficiency and generator efficiency should be included,,
am i right? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
please help in simulating a wind turbine blade in 6 DOF ????.... | usman naseer | Main CFD Forum | 2 | March 10, 2016 03:53 |
Torque of wind turbine simulation | caohan | FLUENT | 8 | August 12, 2014 00:01 |
HAWT, should we use sliding meshes? or the UDF? | f0208secretx | FLUENT | 11 | February 19, 2012 06:58 |
wind turbine simulation, Ansys Post results question | Laions | CFX | 7 | September 20, 2011 06:13 |
3D simulation of wind turbine in Yaw wind(in a lateral wind) | mohammad | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 28, 2010 04:26 |