|
[Sponsors] |
May 30, 2006, 20:15 |
So what can we look forward to in CFX 11?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Or is Ansys keeping it all under wraps?
|
|
May 31, 2006, 03:28 |
Re: So what can we look forward to in CFX 11?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have played with a preview of it. I was specifically looking at its ability to calculate ship waves, and it is doing a very good job of it, much better than CFX 10 or 5.7.
|
|
May 31, 2006, 07:19 |
Re: So what can we look forward to in CFX 11?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Have they implemented a wave function BC or is it more about fiddling with the actual free surface models?
|
|
May 31, 2006, 07:23 |
Re: So what can we look forward to in CFX 11?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
No, this is the VOF model
|
|
May 31, 2006, 15:48 |
Re: So what can we look forward to in CFX 11?
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Spaceball support!!
|
|
June 1, 2006, 08:34 |
Re: So what can we look forward to in CFX 11?
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
??? Whats "Spaceball support" when its at home ???
|
|
June 1, 2006, 18:10 |
Re: So what can we look forward to in CFX 11?
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Can cfx work with cad, does ansys model goes directly into cfx 11 integrated with PLM tools?
that is what they need! P. |
|
June 1, 2006, 19:10 |
Re: So what can we look forward to in CFX 11?
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
ICEMCFD has a nice plugin for ProEngineer which I use all the time ...
|
|
June 2, 2006, 09:05 |
Re: So what can we look forward to in CFX 11?
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
||
June 5, 2006, 23:41 |
Re: So what can we look forward to in CFX 11?
|
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ask your support rep for a preview. Preview 4 has been available for a while now and new capabilities were presented at the ANSYS user conference in April.
There is a lot, but new model-wise the lay of the land is something like this: - Performance: Speed improvments on all platforms, parallel speed improvements esp for cases with GGI interface models - Multiphase: significant free surface model numerics improvements inc coupled volume fractions (huge stability improvments), non equilibrium droplet condensation model with nucleation predicition (MOM based) - Particle tracking: spray injection primary breakup models, spray penetration diagnostics, moving mesh support completion - Mesh morphing: 2nd order transient conservative mass discretisation, steady state calcs, new mesh stiffness recipes, improved accuracy GGI interfaces, easier setup with GGI, mesh quality diagnostics - Radiation: transparent radiation mode (surface to surface monte carlo), speed improvements - Solver CEL: inside()@region function, callback functions on all mesh regions, approximate flows on non BC mesh regions, coordinate frame usage improvements - Turbulence: SAS-SST model, Kato Launder production term mod for k-epsilon, more beta models... eg: Spallart Allmaras - Combustion: partially premixed combustion improvments: weighted reaction progress model, spark ignition model, NOx post processing mode, new laminar/turbulent burning velocity models - 3D Interpolation: Complete rewrite, insanely faster than CFX 10. - Properties: IAPWS (ASME) steam equation of state, peng robinson equation of state, isentropic/polytropic- compression/expansion efficiency monitoring & post processing - Boundary conditions: total enthalpy condition, periodic mass flow/pressure change condition, more acoustic non-reflecting boundary conditions, monopole source output for noise models, Lighthill stress output for noise models That is not everything either... |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX Treatment of Laminar and Turbulent Flows | Jade M | CFX | 18 | September 15, 2022 08:08 |
Different flow pattern between OpenFOAM and CFX | AirS | OpenFOAM | 0 | January 12, 2010 08:08 |
heat generation in CFX | Ema | CFX | 4 | August 7, 2009 06:39 |
CFX 10's solutions differ from CFX 5.7's | Atit Koonsrisuk | CFX | 4 | July 26, 2006 12:59 |
CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 05:07 |