|
[Sponsors] |
February 24, 2020, 05:12 |
Computational time of LES
|
#1 | ||
Member
Thomas
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi everyone
After mainly running RANS and URANS simulations, I am attempting to run an LES case with the WALE sub-grid model. I am aware that LES is computational much more expensive due to the mesh requirement and resulting time step of the simulation. However when running the simulation in ANSYS CFX the computational time of a single iteration, one inner loop, is unexpectedly long. The mesh size is "only" 14M which is rather small for an LES case, running on 62 cores resulting in 225k elements per core. Now for a single inner loop the simulation takes ~49s. I am just curious what the experience is of other users. Just a little more back ground information on the simulation. Simulation batch file: Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
February 24, 2020, 06:59 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,872
Rep Power: 144 |
As LES models are very expensive it is worth doing a careful validation of everything before you commit to the big model. Have you checked you are getting a believable turbulence decay spectrum? Have you checked that you really need the time step size and convergence criteria you are using? Relaxing any of these things will speed the simulation up a lot.
Also, rather than targeting CFL =~1, you will probably find the simulation runs better if you target 3-5 coeff loops per iteration. Finally, I would do a benchmark on your computer cluster to check that it is actually giving you a useful speedup at 62 cores. If your cluster just has ethernet connections then I don't think you will ever get a good speed up over 62 cores (you will need infiniband or another high-end interconnect). This will be even more important if you have lots of cores per compute node. For instance, I would estimate that a 60 core simulation run on 4x 15 core compute nodes connected with ethernet will be slower than a 32 core simulation run on 4x8 core compute nodes.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
laplacianFoam with source term | Herwig | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 17 | November 19, 2019 14:47 |
pressure in incompressible solvers e.g. simpleFoam | chrizzl | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | March 28, 2017 06:49 |
Micro Scale Pore, icoFoam | gooya_kabir | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | November 2, 2013 14:58 |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 16:33 |
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 | bookie56 | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | August 13, 2011 05:03 |