|
[Sponsors] |
March 27, 2006, 01:00 |
CFX + MHD
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Can some body or CFX support team help in getting a sample tutorial case for solving MHD dealing with 2d/3d problem?
Dr C.Bhasker |
|
March 27, 2006, 03:15 |
Re: CFX + MHD
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
We create technology wich used Ansys Multiphysics and Ansys CFX for modelling transient MHD flow with high magnetic Reynold's number, i.e. with influence velocity on magnetic field.
Sorry for my bed english Russia, Syberia, Krasnoyarsk |
|
March 27, 2006, 05:30 |
Re: CFX + MHD
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for your quick response! please send us a example pdf/text file that can work in Ansys-CFX
Regards, Dr C.Bhasker |
|
March 27, 2006, 10:59 |
Re: CFX + MHD
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Dr. Bhasker,
If you contact your CFX help desk, they can provide you with the beta feature description to run MHD problems using ANSYS CFX-10.0.. There is even a sample GUI where you can setup the basics of the problem.. The beta feature allows to solve for the electric potential in the fluid and solid domains.. Includes also a quasi-steady version of the magnetic vector potential formulation. There is no need for User Fortran (as it used to be 5.5.x-> 5.7.1).. For low frequency electromagnetics, all is included within ANSYS CFX. Good luck, Opaque |
|
March 28, 2006, 03:34 |
Re: CFX + MHD
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Opaque I do not have information about the quasi-steady version of the magnetic vector potential formulation in CFX supported two-forked exchange (calculation) Force-Velocity between Navier and Maxwell equation. It is principial moment of correct magnetohydrodynamics. Your citation - "For low frequency electromagnetics, all is included within ANSYS CFX" Magnetohydrodynamics has one principial parameter - the magnetic Reynolds number, which increase with increase of frequancy (for periodic field). If Rem<1 can neglect influence of magnetic field of eddy currents in liquid on field which their call (not exchenge velocity to Maxvell). If Rem>10 exchange (calculation) velocity required. Between 1<Rem<10 the precision of modelling on your conscience. If your have information about exchange (calculation) Force-Velocity between Navier and Maxwell equation in CFX then let us know. Yours faithfully, Eugeny
|
|
March 28, 2006, 03:42 |
Re: CFX + MHD
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sorry, but this site do not supported long message 2 part...
Between 1<Rem<10 the precision of modelling on your conscience. If your have information about exchange (calculation) Force-Velocity between Navier and Maxwell equation in CFX then let us know. Yours faithfully, Eugeny |
|
March 28, 2006, 03:43 |
Re: CFX + MHD
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sorry, but this site do not supported long message 2 part... Between 1<Rem<10 the precision of modelling on your conscience. If your have information about exchange (calculation) Force-Velocity between Navier and Maxwell equation in CFX then let us know. Yours faithfully, Eugeny
|
|
March 28, 2006, 11:08 |
Re: CFX + MHD
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Eugeny,
By quasi-steady version, I meant the transient terms of the Maxwell equations are neglected/dismissed even for transient simulations. Certain class of problems fall into this category, and it is a common approximation in the literature and as you pointed out is a function of the magnetic Reynolds number. The model can be summarized into the use of potential formulations, specifically the electric potential-magnetic vector potential neglecting transient terms. For the electric potential, the equation ANSYS CFX solves is div (J) = div (J_e + J_b) = div (elec_cond * grad (elec_pot)) + div (elec_cond * vel x mag_induct) = 0 and, for the magnetic vector potential components (assumes constant magnetic permeability with Coulomb gauge) div ( mag_perm^-1 grad (mag_vec_pot_i)) = J_i If you contact the CFX help desk, they will provide you with the package to reconfigure the ANSYS CFX solver to allow setting up the models, boundary conditions, and running the solver. For more detailed modeling such as including neglected transient terms or time periodic type of problems, you are probably better off using a more advanced package as ANSYS Multiphysics. Good luck, Opaque.. |
|
August 23, 2011, 02:51 |
Rrquest
|
#9 |
New Member
|
Dear Dr C.Bhasker
I have the same problem that you had. If possible please send me a procedure or tuturial for MHD solve in Ansys. Email: amajburi@yahoo.com Thanks |
|
July 30, 2012, 03:56 |
|
#10 |
New Member
Ramnik Singh
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello,
I have been trying to implement conducting wall boundary condition for the MHD module using the Electric Potential Method. It requires to specify a fixed current or voltage. I am trying to simulate turbulent flow in a square pipe and have not been able to figure out a way to calculate the required potential/voltage at the boundary. Please comment if you have any ideas. Thanks in advance. Regards Ramnik |
|
July 30, 2012, 04:11 |
|
#11 |
New Member
Sainath
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 14 |
There is one example in CFX tutorials "Heat transfer from a heating coil" It is a CHT problem using Electric Resistance heating. Check it out.
|
|
February 3, 2013, 16:53 |
|
#12 |
Member
bitak
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 17 |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL | Val | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 10, 2011 03:20 |
CFX pressure in Simulations problem | nasdak | CFX | 1 | April 14, 2010 14:22 |
MHD in CFX | shahpar73 | CFX | 0 | March 17, 2010 10:59 |
PhD using CFX | Rui | CFX | 9 | May 28, 2007 06:59 |
CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 05:07 |