 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
March 5, 2006, 21:47
|
high resolution or upwind
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Sir,
I want to simulate compressible in a pipe with CFX 10.0. Which way is better, high resolution or upwind? Thank you in advace |
|
|
||
|
March 5, 2006, 22:39
|
Re: high resolution or upwind
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Upwind is only 1st order accurate. Use high resolution if accuracy is needed.
|
|
|
|
||
|
March 9, 2006, 01:09
|
Re: high resolution or upwind
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
use upwind to test the system, see the flow pattern first. Then use high reslution with the upwind.def file as initial value
|
|
|
|
||
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| High Resolution (CFX) vs 2nd Order Upwind (Fluent) | gravis | ANSYS | 3 | March 24, 2011 03:43 |
| about upwind and high resolution | Eric | CFX | 1 | December 30, 2006 07:56 |
| upwind vs high resolution | Richard | CFX | 3 | February 20, 2006 07:35 |
| Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 06:12 |
| Upwind vs High Resolution | Liwau | CFX | 2 | April 20, 2004 12:49 |
Linear Mode
