|
[Sponsors] |
March 4, 2006, 00:15 |
Experts in momentum loss please help
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
i have a flow problem which restricts flow differently in different portions. should i create a single domain and have subdomains which represents different directional loss OR several domains of the different directional loss and link them using domain interfaces? |
|
March 4, 2006, 16:20 |
Re: Experts in momentum loss please help
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I am just curious what is meant by 'restrict flow differently in different directions'? What does this mean physically? Do you mind telling me a little bit about the principle? Thanks, Ruchi |
|
March 5, 2006, 21:17 |
Re: Experts in momentum loss please help
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ruchi,
if an element in CFX has isotropic permeability, it means that the slowing down of flow thru that element is uniform irregardless of the direction. I'm trying to simulate anisotropic permeability ..meaning flow restriction/or slowing down is different in for different directions. |
|
March 6, 2006, 13:54 |
Re: Experts in momentum loss please help
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Jemteo, You can create one single domain and then create sumdomains with different directional loss values.
|
|
March 6, 2006, 14:31 |
Re: Experts in momentum loss please help
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Jemteo,
Have you contacted your CFX Help desk? Are you using Fluid or Porous domains. There are multiple ways of doing these, and some are well documented.. If you are using Porous domains, and need anisotropic porosity (as in CFX-4.x) ask your CFX help desk on how to access that functionality... It seems to be a beta feature.. Good luck, Opaque.. |
|
March 7, 2006, 16:56 |
Re: Experts in momentum loss please help
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jemteo:
There are alot of ways you can do this. You can also accomplish this using a single domain, using general momentum source/sink with expressions that limit the effected region to only a portion of the area. I have used this to increase the complexity of the resistance region in already defined models. In my particular case I used 3 step functions to confine the sink to a cubical area within a larger domain. |
|
March 8, 2006, 20:36 |
Re: Experts in momentum loss please help
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi thanks for the help. i'm using CFX-5.x. still trying at it... i m also using transient flow.....getting oscillating rMS not sure if it is converging nicely
|
|
March 15, 2006, 23:42 |
Re: Experts in momentum loss please help
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
when i use each zone (of different momentum) as subdomains my convergence faces a WALL HAS BEEN PLACED AT PORTIONS ....(at 100% of the faces...) but when i use each zone as different domains (and strangely CFX automatically creates interfaces) my convergence now has less than 40% with walls being placed.....
can anyone shed some light on this? txs |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Momentum source coefficient and convergence | meh | CFX | 9 | October 12, 2020 09:37 |
Simulation of Axial Fan Flow using A Momentum Source Subdomain | Liam | CFX | 28 | July 16, 2013 09:24 |
Momentum source / porous loss | ijk | CFX | 5 | May 20, 2011 11:30 |
Derivation of Momentum Equation in Integral Form | Demonwolf | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 29, 2009 20:53 |
2D momentum source for pressure loss | Bernhard Dobmeier | CFX | 0 | December 5, 2006 05:05 |