|
[Sponsors] |
March 2, 2006, 12:40 |
parallel runs
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am running a very large transient run at the moment, due to this, we have just bought in a pair of parallel licences. I am now doing this run on 2 machines using PVM distributed. I know I can not use local as i have only single core machines. My question is, that as 250 timesteps have taken 5 days, is MPI going to be any faster?
|
|
March 5, 2006, 17:32 |
Re: parallel runs
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
On windows, probably yes. On linux, probably no. Why not just try it and find out for yourself? Glenn Horrocks |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
parallel fluent runs being killed at partitioing | Ben Aga | FLUENT | 3 | June 8, 2012 11:40 |
Inconsistent behaviour of gMax/gMin for parallel runs | gschaider | OpenFOAM Bugs | 5 | July 29, 2009 15:23 |
Trouble with parallel runs | cfdmarkus | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | February 27, 2009 04:59 |
Differences between serial and parallel runs | carsten | OpenFOAM Bugs | 11 | September 12, 2008 12:16 |
Distributed parallel runs on ANSYS CFX 10 | Manoj Kumar | CFX | 4 | January 25, 2006 09:00 |