|
[Sponsors] |
Bubble column Substracting the drag on the liquid phase |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 2, 2019, 11:47 |
Bubble column Substracting the drag on the liquid phase
|
#1 |
Member
cfxtwophaseflow
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi,
I'm setting up a multiphase simulation using CFX for a bubble column. I set the water as the continuous Fluid and the bubbles as the dispersed fluid. I want to set the interfacial forces acting on the liquid phase to zero. I know it is not accurate but it is for a verification purpose. I put the drag = 0 and I added a drag force by a user expression as a Momentum source for the bubbles, the simulation didn't work. Than I kept the drag and I substract it by a user function Momentum source on the liquid. The simulation worked but it the liquid didn't stay stagnant. I may be doing it wrong. Is there any other way to do it?? |
|
October 2, 2019, 13:06 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33 |
How did you add the momentum source?
Can you show your setup for the momentum source only? |
|
October 2, 2019, 13:57 |
|
#3 |
Member
cfxtwophaseflow
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 9 |
I added a subdomain, I put the location as the whole domain, then in the fluid Sources, I selected Water - Momentum Source - General Momentum Source and in x,y,z component I put the drag force components as for the x component -(3/4)*air.vf*water.density*sqrt(UrU^2+UrV^2+UrW^2)*CD/air.mean particle diameter *(air.Velocity u-water.Velocity u)
UrU = (air.Velocity u-water.Velocity u)… and CD is equal to 0.44 because in the fluid pair model I put the drag coefficient = 0.44 for simplification . |
|
October 2, 2019, 14:07 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33 |
How much source/linearization coefficient are you using?
|
|
October 2, 2019, 15:03 |
|
#5 |
Member
cfxtwophaseflow
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 9 |
||
October 3, 2019, 09:25 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,880
Rep Power: 33 |
You need to linearize such a source term; otherwise, it will only converge for a very small timestep (if it ever converges).
The linearization coefficient is the derivative of the source term respect to the variable being solved for, say velocity u/v/w, in the equation. In the case of the momentum equation, it should be a vector, but since a single linearization entry is provided (isotropic linearization), you must pick the most conservative value, that is, the maximum between any of the 3 possible derivatives. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
twoPhaseEulerFoam bubble column crashes due to problems at outlet region | hester | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | July 21, 2024 09:19 |
Monitoring Volume Average of Liquid Velocity Magnitude in a Bubble Column / Airlift | kevinlipps | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 4 | May 19, 2016 06:59 |
twoPhaseEulerFoam: turbulence on produces instability of drag phase | florian_krause | OpenFOAM | 1 | October 11, 2013 10:02 |
Bubble Column | Glen | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 24, 2006 01:56 |
compressible two phase flow in CFX4.4 | youngan | CFX | 0 | July 2, 2003 00:32 |