|
[Sponsors] |
Setting up radiation model for air and water in CFX |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 6, 2019, 10:43 |
Setting up radiation model for air and water in CFX
|
#1 |
New Member
Aleksei
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi everyone,
My sumulation is as follows: 1. I've got enclosed air domain with initial temperature around 35 C with several hot solid bodies inside the space with temperatures up to 700 C 2. In that domain there is also a solid domain, inside which there is water domain. I'd like to know which radiation model(s) I need to use in those domains. Please have a look at a picture for clarification. My final objective is to get the tempereature distribution in water and air domain. |
|
September 7, 2019, 08:09 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,872
Rep Power: 144 |
The choice of radiation model depends on the radiation conditions. There are several models available for optically thick mediums, and only two available for optically transparent media (Monte Carlo and Discrete transfer). Read the documentation about the assumptions behind these models to determine which is most suitable for you.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
September 7, 2019, 17:44 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Aleksei
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
I went through the documenataion of CFX quite carefully. I understand that air is considered as optically thin -> Monte Carlo / Discrete Transfer should be used. As for solid domain - the only available option is Monte Carlo for solids. I still can't understand if water is considered as optically thick or optically thin. |
||
September 8, 2019, 08:40 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,872
Rep Power: 144 |
Solid domain - you only use a radiation model here if radiation does something. Radiation will only do something if it is transparent. If it is opaque then don't use a radiation model in the solid domain. The effects of the radiation on the surrounding fluid domain acts on the interface between the domains.
Whether water is optically thick or thin depends on how far a typical photon will get before it is absorbed. If a photon would typically reach a surface or penetrate a long way into the fluid then it is optically thin and you should use the Monte Carlo or Discrete Transfer approaches. If a typical photon will only go a short way before being absorbed then use the simpler radiation models.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
Solver refuses to run: Monte Carlo Radiation Model | Zaphod'sSecondHead | CFX | 9 | February 14, 2017 10:20 |
Error in Two phase (condensation) modeling | adilsyyed | CFX | 15 | June 24, 2015 20:42 |
Has someone used CFX Monte Carlo Radiation for UV Water treatment applications? | tchavdarov | CFX | 7 | November 20, 2014 19:45 |
Cfx aborted due to unknown errors | AKHILESH S L | CFX | 2 | October 10, 2013 18:16 |