|
[Sponsors] |
May 24, 2019, 03:53 |
|
#21 | |
Senior Member
Pedro Oliveira
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Portugal
Posts: 109
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
The density is 998 kg/m^3 at the beggining, but with the energy source it varies with time doesn´t it? |
||
May 24, 2019, 04:01 |
|
#22 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,928
Rep Power: 28 |
Is the system stirred (forced convection) or do you only have free convection?
|
|
May 24, 2019, 04:01 |
|
#23 |
Senior Member
Pedro Oliveira
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Portugal
Posts: 109
Rep Power: 8 |
||
May 24, 2019, 04:16 |
|
#24 | |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,928
Rep Power: 28 |
Quote:
If you don't understand this, then you should not do CFD. If your liquid mass remains the same, but your density decreases, then your liquid volume increases (I consider liquid as incompessibe). In real life your container will burst or increase in size as Glenn mentioned. In CFD your volume is fixed and rigid. So it cannot compensate or 'breath'. This leads to serious numerical troubles, because mass is not conserved. And that is killing your calculation immediately. Last edited by Gert-Jan; May 24, 2019 at 11:37. |
||
May 27, 2019, 04:08 |
|
#25 | |
Senior Member
Pedro Oliveira
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Portugal
Posts: 109
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
My doubt is, I´m heating the water with 1000W (not considering phase change or gas presence) and the pressure doesn´t increase when I use constant density and specific heat, but it increases allot with IAWPS water material. I know that with the molecules vibrations increasing the force on the walls hould too (pressure), WhY DOesn´t increase? Last edited by oliveira1820; May 27, 2019 at 05:22. |
||
May 27, 2019, 04:32 |
|
#26 | ||
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,928
Rep Power: 28 |
Quote:
Quote:
Bottom line, CFX is a flow solver where a lot of models can be added. But vibrating molecules...... Sure kinetic effects are somewhere incorporated in one of the submodels. But I am not sure what your idea and expectations are. I would contact your supervisor what to do. |
|||
May 27, 2019, 05:23 |
|
#27 | |
Senior Member
Pedro Oliveira
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Portugal
Posts: 109
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
Do you know any formula which will allowed me to calcuate the pressure of liquids in a closed recipient with temperature? |
||
May 27, 2019, 05:35 |
|
#28 |
Senior Member
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,928
Rep Power: 28 |
No. But just follow:
Average temperature -> lower density -> water volume increase -> pressure increase using the compressibility (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Properties_of_water) All based on the assumption that your container contains no gas, and is completely rigid, which is unrealistic. But that is your choice. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Getting divergence while increasing the back pressure at pressure outlet | greenfields15 | FLUENT | 0 | March 19, 2018 00:39 |
Periodic flow using Cyclic - comparison with Fluent | nusivares | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 30 | December 12, 2017 06:35 |
outlet pressure Boundary settings -velocity streamline under ambient temp.conditions | Vishnu_bharathi | CFX | 12 | November 21, 2017 07:56 |
error message | cuteapathy | CFX | 14 | March 20, 2012 07:45 |
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History | Abhi | Main CFD Forum | 12 | July 8, 2002 10:11 |