CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Simulate horizontal agitators by momentum source

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 20, 2019, 09:05
Default Simulate horizontal agitators by momentum source
  #1
New Member
 
Tural
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
Thural is on a distinguished road
Dear Users,

I am new CFX user and want to simulate aeration and mixing processes in wastewater tank.
My model is an open mixing tank which contains 2 horizontal agitators in different location and air diffuser grid on bottom of tank. it is a batch tank model.
Instead of using propeller for agitators, I have created subdomain 1 and subdomain 2 for each agitators. I used general momentum source and gave values (including low and high) to the proper momentum source component in order to obtain water flow inside tank.
However, there is only water flow inside and around of subdomains. Water velocity in the tank is zero.

I have seen and read relevant momentum source posts here but I still can not solve this problem. What might be the main reasons of zero velocity in the tank?
As far as I understand from the relevant posts, momentum source is the one of the main methods used to initialize the fluid flow.

Thanks in advance
Thural is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2019, 16:28
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,816
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Please post an image of what you are getting and your output file.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2019, 07:07
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Tural
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
Thural is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
Please post an image of what you are getting and your output file.
Good day,
I uploaded screenshot of CFD-post which shows the velocity but output file size exceeds the limit. Zip file size with compressed docx is still more than allowed size.
Attached Images
File Type: png Pic2.PNG (154.5 KB, 19 views)
Thural is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2019, 22:08
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,816
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
The output file is a text file. Just post it as is, compressed if needs be. Don't put it in Word.

Your image is very weird. It shows some flow local to what I presume are the impellers, but also some bands of flow as well. This appears to not be conservative. Are you sure it is converged?
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 4, 2019, 06:33
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Tural
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
Thural is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
The output file is a text file. Just post it as is, compressed if needs be. Don't put it in Word.

Your image is very weird. It shows some flow local to what I presume are the impellers, but also some bands of flow as well. This appears to not be conservative. Are you sure it is converged?
Good day,

I have applied momentum source term approach with different values. The images of water velocity vector, plane and output file are below. I used "axial thrust of the mixers per cylindrical volume of subdomain" as a general momentum source and pictures, output file are belong to this method.
The result of simulation shows that water velocity vectors move out from the subdomain and return to backside by creating recirculation zone around of the each subdomain.
Also, I have used -C( Water.Velocity w - wspec) equation for momentum source term with momentum source coefficient. When I use high values such as C=10^5, max value of the velocity is too high which is not acceptable. Although water velocity is not zero inside the tank, there is recirculation around the subdomains again with very high speed(~100 m/s). it seems like after high speed recirculation around the subdomains, water flow destroy the barrier in front of them.
By decreasing value of C, I got reasonable values for water velocity, but there was no fluid motion inside the tank except around of subdomains like previous picture. And still have water flow recirculation around subdomains in each case.
What can be the reason of recirculation?

Thanks in advance.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Plane.JPG (97.7 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg Velocity Vector.JPG (192.9 KB, 13 views)

Last edited by Thural; April 4, 2019 at 07:49.
Thural is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 4, 2019, 06:49
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,816
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Firstly - in my previous post I requested you to just post the output text file, not to put it in word. But you have put it in word again. This is the last time I will look at a word file, I will be ignoring any future word files.

You have not defined a source term coefficient. It is very difficult to converge without this defined. Your problems look like you are just getting poor convergence and this is explained by you not using a source term coefficient.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 4, 2019, 07:58
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Tural
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
Thural is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your quick reply. I have already used momentum source coefficient in my previous simulations and got similar results.
Thural is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 4, 2019, 17:26
Default
  #8
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,816
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Can I have a look at your output file again? Just post it as a text file, compressed if needs be.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 5, 2019, 07:33
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Tural
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
Thural is on a distinguished road
Good evening,

You can find it in the following ZIP folder.
Attached Files
File Type: zip Output file.zip (99.8 KB, 4 views)
Thural is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 6, 2019, 06:00
Default
  #10
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,816
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
* You are using single precision. Double precision will help.
* You have defined the time step size. How did you work this out? If it was a guess it is almost certainly wrong. Adaptive time stepping is recommended, homing in on 3-5 coeff loops per iteration. (UPDATE: I see your run is converging with 6 coeff loops per iteration so it is not too far off, but still a little bigger than recommended)
* You have not defined momentum source term coefficient. This is very important, it won't converge without this set correctly.
* you have set max coeff loops = 16, min=6. The recommended settings is max=10, min=0.
* Have you checked your convergence criteria is good enough? Have you done a sensitivity analysis?
* You can try the coupled volume fraction solver. Sometimes that helps a lot.
* You have second order time stepping. I would use first order while you do this basic debugging, and go back to second order once it is working reliably.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 9, 2019, 07:37
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Tural
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
Thural is on a distinguished road
Mr. Horrocks,

Thank you for your detailed explanation and help. I am going to implement your ideas on the simulation as soon as possible.
Thural is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[swak4Foam] swak4foam for OpenFOAM 4.0 mnikku OpenFOAM Community Contributions 80 May 17, 2022 08:06
[foam-extend.org] Problems installing foam-extend-4.0 on openSUSE 42.2 and Ubuntu 16.04 ordinary OpenFOAM Installation 19 September 3, 2019 18:13
[swak4Foam] groovyBC in openFOAM-2.0 for parabolic velocity bc ofslcm OpenFOAM Community Contributions 25 March 6, 2017 10:03
[OpenFOAM.org] Error creating ParaView-4.1.0 OpenFOAM 2.3.0 tlcoons OpenFOAM Installation 13 April 20, 2016 17:34
centOS 5.6 : paraFoam not working yossi OpenFOAM Installation 2 October 9, 2013 01:41


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:19.