|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Iljar Dickhof
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Hello all,
I'm trying to model an impeller which rotates in an air box while being connnected to an inlet-vent. In this model I've tried te make a rotating fluid domain for the impeller which rotates in the air box (stationary fluid domain). I've set the frame change option for the interface between stationary and rotational to "Frozen Rotor". Then an error occurs which says: "the Pitch change option 'Automatic' is not valid if side 1 or 2 of the interface has a 360 degree or greater pitch angle, ..." I now know something is wrong with the interface between the rotating domain and the stationairy domain and when i'm trying to solve this problem it fails immediately. Does anyone know how to solve this problem? What do I need to fill in for Pitch change or do I need to make a different interface with different options between stationary and rotational? Greetings, Iljar Dickhof |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
urosgrivc
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
Yes, the answer is:
Do not put all Contact surfaces under one interface. make two or more interfaces, and put faces which have Constant radial dimension in one interface and surfaces which have fixed axial direction in the second connection. And you can select pitch change, none, if it doesn't affect your simulation (This one is probably the culprit) Please provide feedback if it worked. Last edited by urosgrivc; March 15, 2019 at 04:14. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
M
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 692
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
You should actually use pitch change none! We recently had a case where CFX internally decided that it was some wrong value (with automatic setup) and results were unreasonable. For cases when you model all 360° of the rotating interface, this is the way to go I think.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
New Member
Iljar Dickhof
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Hallo all,
First of all, thanks for responding. You're the best! Secondly, I splitted the interface of the rotor in more interfaces: 3 interfaces for rotor to box and 1 interface for rotor to inlet. All interfaces have for pitch change "none" selected. I also compressed the air box because it wasn't necessary to be this big. It led unfortunately to more errors (image 1). In the first image it says the pitch change can only by "none" if the interface between face 1 and 2 perfectly match. I think it has something to do with the mesh connection between these faces, correct me if i'm wrong. My mesh can be seen in image 2. Does anyone know how i perfectly align the faces or is there another solution which i'm not seeing. Note: It has nothing to do with the direction of the interfaces (axial or radial) as can be seen in image 3, where the same error occurs as in image 1. I would like to hear from you. Greetings, Iljar |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
urosgrivc
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
You do have perfectly matching faces, so dont worry about this one just select none and you can leave it as it is
yellow exclamation point is not a fatal error, cfx is just making sure that you know what you are doing The Red X, now that is the problem though, that needs to be solved Last edited by urosgrivc; March 18, 2019 at 02:15. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
New Member
Iljar Dickhof
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 7 ![]() |
Well, i restarted cfx-pre again and the red error disappeared. I don't know why... I did manage to get some results (see images) so I think my problem is fixed.
Thanks for the help! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
urosgrivc
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
My recommendation to improve your simulation is only this;
that you make the mesh better at the interface, it is best if the mesh is conformal at the interface, if this is not possible (like for transient rotor-stator) than it is good if the mesh size on both sides of the interface is the same. this is not necessary but is much better Last edited by urosgrivc; March 18, 2019 at 06:23. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
cfx, impeller simulation, interface defining, rotating body |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wind turbine simulation | Saturn | CFX | 60 | July 17, 2024 05:45 |
My radial inflow turbine | Abo Anas | CFX | 27 | May 11, 2018 01:44 |
Question about adaptive timestepping | Guille1811 | CFX | 25 | November 12, 2017 17:38 |
Wrong flow in ratating domain problem | Sanyo | CFX | 17 | August 15, 2015 06:20 |
RPM in Wind Turbine | Pankaj | CFX | 9 | November 23, 2009 04:05 |