|
[Sponsors] |
January 28, 2019, 21:24 |
Earthquake time history in CFX
|
#1 |
Member
Aashi
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 8 |
Hey hello to every one i want to ask that is there any way to input acceleration vs time data in cfx as load e.g
acceleration vs time 0.2g at 1 sec 0.24g at 2 sec 0.3g at 3 sec 0.12g at 4 sec and so on |
|
January 29, 2019, 01:45 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
urosgrivc
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 12 |
Yes, this can be easily done with user functions:
type: "user function" in the search above or google, it has been talked about a lot of times. I have personally written it about 4 times already. [slide 11 but do watch the whole video] -> https://slideplayer.com/slide/6255657/ |
|
January 29, 2019, 19:02 |
Thanks sir
|
#3 |
Member
Aashi
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 8 |
Thanks for your kind response God bless you
|
|
March 13, 2021, 06:28 |
Seismic Acceleration in CFX
|
#4 |
New Member
Mahesh
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi, Can anyone help how to input frequency (Hz) vs Acceleration (m/s^2) to CFX?
|
|
March 13, 2021, 11:00 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Kira
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Canada
Posts: 435
Rep Power: 9 |
||
March 14, 2021, 23:53 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Mahesh
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 6 |
HI, thanks for the reply. I came to know how to give frequency vs acceleration from post#2. But could not find the syntax about how to mention that function in gravity as shown in Fig-1. Please help
|
|
March 15, 2021, 04:40 |
|
#7 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,871
Rep Power: 144 |
Be aware that defining varying accelerations, especially varying accelerations in multiple directions is not fully supported by CFX. In other words it introduces additional terms into the equations which are not accounted for. This is especially for multiple directions as this will introduce rotations and then things like centripetal and coriolis effects are ignored.
If you want to model this accurately you need to use moving mesh and make the mesh motion prescribe your accelerations. But the approach you are using may be accurate enough, depending on how significant the additional terms which are not included are in your case.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
Tags |
cfx & fluent |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
pressure in incompressible solvers e.g. simpleFoam | chrizzl | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | March 28, 2017 06:49 |
Micro Scale Pore, icoFoam | gooya_kabir | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | November 2, 2013 14:58 |
pisoFoam with k-epsilon turb blows up - Some questions | Heroic | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 26 | December 17, 2012 04:34 |
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 | bookie56 | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | August 13, 2011 05:03 |
IcoFoam parallel woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 22, 2007 03:58 |