|
[Sponsors] |
December 11, 2018, 12:04 |
Flow over airfoil naca0012
|
#1 |
New Member
Darlin L. V
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi guys,
i am doing a project on naca0012 of 1m chord length in ansys cfx with the following properties - incompressible, subsonic turbulent flow (air) - Reynolds no = 26e+5, free stream v = 40m/s, ref pressure = 101 kPa, static pressure 293K - with an inflation layer (based on height of first boundary layer to wall) of 8.3e-5 m. but the result I got doesn't convince me, especially for the velocity contours the cL and cD plots. would there be an issue on the set up that i use that have an effect on this? SET UP isothermal at 20 degrees C (is this correct), as i know compressible flows are done with total energy. I am using SST turbulence model please find attached file of the plotted contours. any guidance will be helpful, thank you very much |
|
December 11, 2018, 17:44 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
There is an FAQ on accuracy: https://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansy..._inaccurate.3F
Looking at your results you appear to have some fundamental problems. Your velocity contours show high velocity at the top of your domain and low at the bottom. What is doing that? That does not look right. On your pressure contours you have a bubble of high pressure at the top left corner and a bubble of low pressure in the bottom left corner. Again, this is not right. And finally, this should be an incompressible flow and Mach Number is not defined. But you are showing Mach number - so are you actually doing a compressible simulation? Is this what you intended? Please post your Output file so we can check it.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
December 12, 2018, 02:16 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
urosgrivc
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 12 |
try reconsidering the domain size,
probably this is the cause of weird velocity contour and other results of course. Farr field boundary conditions must not influence your results, the solution must be independent of certain BCs. unless you want to include the tunnel to make some kind of real comparison study or what Last edited by urosgrivc; December 12, 2018 at 03:58. |
|
Tags |
cd & cl, cd. cfd analysis setting, naca0012 k-epsilon, pressure coeff, sst |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
About Some Concepts:Laminar flow, turbulent flow, steady flow and time-dependent flow | Jing | Main CFD Forum | 8 | October 5, 2018 18:02 |
Urgent Help !!!Strange reverse flow in naca0012 problem | parvez2683 | FLUENT | 5 | May 20, 2013 10:25 |
problem in modeling flow over a 3d airfoil | guess | Main CFD Forum | 8 | March 20, 2010 14:54 |
About the invisd flow around an airfoil | maximus | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 16, 2005 16:04 |
Simulating NACA0012 for inviscid flow. | Stan | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 13, 2005 15:22 |