|
[Sponsors] |
March 3, 2005, 08:49 |
About timestep in transient mod
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Using CFX5.7 for transient mod....How to define timestep??If it is the physical time that the flow passed the domain????
|
|
March 3, 2005, 14:50 |
Re: About timestep in transient mod
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Your timestep needs to be small enough to resolve the transient features of your flow. Generally this means that you should converge within 3 to 5 coefficient loops within your timestep.
A timestep equal to the resident time would be far too big. Regards, Robin |
|
March 4, 2005, 13:06 |
Re: About timestep in transient mod
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Under a laminar flow simulation, what be the possible reason that would cause the solution to diverge with smaller timestep?
|
|
March 5, 2005, 16:24 |
Re: About timestep in transient mod
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Good guidance would be to start with the courant limit. This is the smallest element length divided by the expected velocity through that element (i.e. the time it takes a fluid particle to pass through one mesh element). For an accurate time marching solution, you certainly don't want anything larger than that.
Highly fluctuating oscillations may require an even smaller step size, but it's a good place to start. Jeff |
|
March 6, 2005, 01:11 |
Re: About timestep in transient mod
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you for your suggestions,,,
|
|
March 6, 2005, 17:36 |
Re: About timestep in transient mod
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
To answer Chien's question: Smaller timesteps can lead to divergence as you can now resolve more flow features. For modelling a bluff body with a large timestep can just show a large wake, whereas the same model with a fine timestep can resolve the details of the oscillating vorticies in the wake. Resolving these vorticies is a tougher ask numerically than the bulk flow field, so if your simulation is not very stable it could cause divergence. Glenn Horrocks |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
transient timestep ? | amine | CFX | 2 | June 28, 2008 20:22 |
transient timestep | tony | CFX | 1 | March 12, 2008 17:39 |
Timestep for transient simulation | houman | CFX | 2 | April 28, 2005 04:44 |
transient, parallel - problem with timestep | Peter | CFX | 5 | March 8, 2005 17:15 |
Timestep in transient flow | Zaher | CFX | 2 | March 13, 2004 03:48 |