|
[Sponsors] |
December 5, 2004, 16:49 |
YPlus value -- CFX 5.7
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am doing flow through wall problems, I choose SST model for it, but SST model is good for Yplus value less than 2, the Yplus value I got is always bigger than 2, min I got is around 3, can I still use SST model?
Also sometimes I use more elements for mesh, but Yplus value got bigger, can somebody give some suggestions on Yplus value vs. mesh? and how it affect model selection and results? Thanks. |
|
December 5, 2004, 17:39 |
Re: YPlus value -- CFX 5.7
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
The SST model with automatic wall functions is fine for y+ up to several hundred. Of course it will be in wall function mode rather than integrate to the wall mode for these large y+ and that may or may not be appropriate for you simulation depending on what you are doing. Glenn Horrocks |
|
December 6, 2004, 07:25 |
Re: YPlus value -- CFX 5.7
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yep,
Like Glenn said, the SST will just run using the standard wall function approach in the Y+ > 1 range. Your best bet is to go back and reduce your first cell size and re-run the simulation and check the Y+. I usually do one or two Y+ scoping runs (solving for 10 or so iterations) to get a feel for the Y+, subsequently modifying the mesh density near the wall to get the correct Y+. Regards James |
|
December 7, 2004, 21:46 |
Re: YPlus value -- CFX 5.7
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I am puzzled in y+, Could you tell me the rang of y+ when using different models? Susn
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7 | Joseph | CFX | 14 | April 20, 2010 16:45 |
Yplus in CFX | Eric | CFX | 10 | November 10, 2006 10:44 |
Import a rectangular domain into CFX 5.7 from ICEM | SKLam | CFX | 9 | March 8, 2006 01:47 |
CFX 10 in CFX 5.7 | panneerselvam.R | CFX | 6 | February 6, 2006 04:56 |
CFX 5.7 pre | Neser | CFX | 0 | January 27, 2005 12:22 |