|
[Sponsors] |
November 23, 2004, 00:28 |
Meshing
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all, I have a doubt about the meshing work using hypermesh for CFD problems. My question is to what extent it will support CFD problems, is it fair to use for my CFD problems instead of ICEM, Gridgen.
Thanks and Regards RAJURAMAIAH |
|
November 23, 2004, 01:22 |
Re: Meshing
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
We also tested hypermesh for structural problems mainly, but I check CFD meshing capabilities and found that it have not suffucient capabilities. As I understood prismatic layers can not go through inlet,outlet(any openings) - only closed surfaces allowed. For such problems it can generate higher quality meshes than ICEM because of AFLR algorithm.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ANSYS Meshing] Migrating from GAMBIT to ANSYS Meshing | David-CFD | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | April 1, 2011 06:22 |
Best Meshing scheme for Cylinder | Nutrex | Main CFD Forum | 4 | July 29, 2008 12:03 |
Meshing locks workbench window. | andy2o | CFX | 0 | February 1, 2008 06:01 |
Singularity of grid?Volume meshing vs face meshing | Ken | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 4, 2003 12:09 |
Volume Meshing & Face Meshing? singularity of grid | ken | FLUENT | 0 | September 4, 2003 12:08 |