|
[Sponsors] |
October 19, 2004, 04:47 |
Multiphase in CFX4 and CFX5
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all,
Could some one please share with me their multiphase simulation experience with CFX4 and CFX5 (let us consider the latest of both, CFX4.4 and CFX5.7). I am simulating a solid-liquid system in a stirred tank using same simulation stategy in both CFX5.7 and CFX4.4. I have got 172k cells in CFX4.4 and 526k cells in CFX5.7 in same geometry size. Before I prempt anybody's objective opinion, let me ask, has any body noticed any significant (more than 80%) difference? Or am I just comparing apples (structured grid) and oranges (unstructured grid)? regards Anne |
|
October 19, 2004, 06:35 |
Re: Multiphase in CFX4 and CFX5
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
check out the number of nodes.
|
|
October 19, 2004, 10:52 |
Re: Multiphase in CFX4 and CFX5
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Okay, let me give specific figures now: CFX4.4 cells = 199,888 nodes = 29,640 CFX5.7 cells = 525,276 nodes = 98,672
thanks Anne |
|
October 19, 2004, 11:37 |
Re: Multiphase in CFX4 and CFX5
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Why don't you import the CFX-4 (.geo) and run in your CFX-5 (load it into PRE) and check the results?
|
|
October 19, 2004, 13:07 |
Re: Multiphase in CFX4 and CFX5
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Stevie,
That was the most obvious thing to do, but there were some limitation as far as the model importation from CFX4.4 to CFX5.7 was concerned. That is already an explored area with the cfx support. Thanks for the suggestion. regards Anne |
|
October 19, 2004, 15:01 |
Re: Multiphase in CFX4 and CFX5
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I meant that you could use the same grid for both codes. This way you could trace the main differences between the models implemented within the codes, not using an hexaedral mesh for one code and a hybrid mesh for another one, i.e., comparing bananas and watermelons in my point of view.
|
|
October 20, 2004, 05:36 |
Re: Multiphase in CFX4 and CFX5
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The nodes and cells should be the same (approx.) for cfx4.
|
|
October 20, 2004, 05:51 |
Re: Multiphase in CFX4 and CFX5
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Jon,
You are right, CFX4.4 is based on a structured grid. I forgot to put is this way; CFX4.4 cells = 199,888 BOUNDARY nodes = 29,640. You may well just ignore the boundary nodes as i guess they may not be critical for the present discussion as they have a differnt meanig to the CFX5 nodes. regards Anne |
|
October 30, 2004, 22:20 |
Re: Multiphase in CFX4 and CFX5
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Anne,
As "Stevie" mentioned, on the same grid, with exactly the same problem setup, with decent convergence levels, the two codes should give fairly similar answers. They will never give the same answers as they are two completely different flow solvers, eg: CFX-4 is uncoupled/cell centered, CFX-5 is coupled/cell-vertex. Exactly why can't you import your CFX-4 grid? This should be possible for sure. Neale. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX4 to CFX5 | Kumar | CFX | 1 | December 16, 2004 16:08 |
a qestion about CFX4 and CFX5 | cfxbeginner | CFX | 2 | October 25, 2002 09:01 |
Opinion about CFX4 and CFX5 | Jan Rusås | CFX | 17 | August 17, 2002 17:28 |
why is it not convergence in CFX4 but in CFX5? | ycfxbeginer | CFX | 1 | January 27, 2002 17:32 |
Convert CFX4 dmp's to CFX5 Res's? | Michael Bo Hansen | CFX | 3 | May 10, 2001 09:55 |