|
[Sponsors] |
Different temperature after mesh refinement!? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 13, 2004, 16:43 |
Different temperature after mesh refinement!?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi to all!
I tried a simple problem. It is a quadratic channel (duct) where air of a defined temperature and mass flow rate is blown trough an inlet. On one side of the channel I set a heat flux. The other 3 walls are adiabatic. In CFX-Post I calculated the average temperature (640 K) on the surface where the heat flux was set. The arithmetic and the area average were nearly the same because the mesh is quite homogeneous. I solved the same geometry under the same conditions after a mesh refinement. The average temperature now is 970 K. After another refinement I derived 1070 K. I checked the global energy balance. It was fulfilled in all three cases. Has anybody an idea where the problem is??? Regards, Mark |
|
October 13, 2004, 18:36 |
Re: Different temperature after mesh refinement!?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You need to give more details of how you are refining the mesh.
Mesh refinement should result in a more accurate modelling of the boundary layer, which is critical in this type of convective heat transfer. So your results being mesh dependant are hardly surprising. As you refine the mesh is the temperature starting to reach an asymptote? Are you using mesh inflation? What are your wall y+ values? |
|
October 13, 2004, 19:15 |
Re: Different temperature after mesh refinement!?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Don't forget that if you are using inflation layers at your boundaries, they are not refined tangent to the surface, but only prependicular to the surface. This means mesh refinement does not reduce the y+ value at walls with inflation layers. Glenn Horrocks |
|
October 14, 2004, 22:18 |
Re: Different temperature after mesh refinement!?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for your answers!
It really seems to depend on the more accurate calculation of the boundary layer. My options in mesh design are limited to the tetra mesher of ICEM CFD 4.CFX, because I don't have a license for the hex mesher. I tried to work with the ANSYS Workbench but I have problems in creating a fluid domain that does not enclose the whole solid domain. I need a fluid domain going through my solid domain. Is it possible with the workbench? Thanks, Mark |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow | vishwa | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 24 | June 27, 2016 09:54 |
[snappyHexMesh] non-smooth mesh | Svensson | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | January 18, 2012 10:13 |
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file | SSL | FLUENT | 2 | January 26, 2008 12:55 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |
Mesh refinement and the errors. | Korsh Mik | CFX | 0 | January 11, 2006 08:07 |