|
[Sponsors] |
September 14, 2004, 14:55 |
Particle mass flow rate
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
There is a command in CFX 4.4, PARTICLE MASS FLOW RATES which tells the software how many particles the tracked particle is representing. What I gather is that we have to only specify mass not the mass flow rate. I would really appreciate if anybody can explain the mathematical significance of the mass flow rate and the equation where it is used. Thanks Jeffery |
|
September 15, 2004, 19:40 |
Re: Particle mass flow rate
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jeff,
Imagine that each particle track is a string of beads. Particles travel along these tracks at a calculated velocity. What's not known, however, is how close these particles are spaced along the tracks. A slower PARTICLE MASS FLOW RATE means that the particles are "injected" along the tracks at sparse intervals. A very high PARTICLE MASS FLOW RATE means that the particles are packed in a tight stream. Sources to the fluid are dependent on how fast particles are passing through a given cell. If a track carries one particle/min, it contributes a lower source than if there are 100 particles/min. Note, this particle flow rate is independent of the velocity calculated for the track. Hope this helps, Jeff |
|
September 16, 2004, 02:45 |
Re: Particle mass flow rate
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
But what does mass flow rate signify in steady state flow ? Won't it be sufficient if I only specify mass ? May be answer to this is in the explanation you gave but this remains a confusion.
Also, if i put mass flow rate = 0, what would be it's effect on particle tracking ? Jeff |
|
September 17, 2004, 11:46 |
Re: Particle mass flow rate
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Remember, particles are injected and travel through the domain independent of flow, other than the drag between the particles and the fluid. They may be moving faster or slower than the fluid. BECAUSE the flow is steady state, the particles have to be injected at a steady mass flow rate (the rate that particles cross the inlet plane). If I simply specify the total mass of particles to be injected, let's say all at once in a big slug, then the problem becomes transient because we're tracking this cloud of particles down stream only once.
From a process perspective, consider I have a pipeline with fluid moving though it at some flow rate. Also consider that at one location, I am injecting particles from above through a big hopper. If I inject the particles slowly (a low particle mass flow rate) then the fluid downstream will have a light particle loading and the sources on the fluid will be low. If I open the damper and drop the particles in faster (at a high particle mass flow rate) then the particle loading will be much higher and the sources on the fluid will be higher. In this light, a particle mass flow rate of zero should reduce the source term on the fluid to zero (no particle loading at all). The drag on the particle, for trajectory purposes is independent of the particle mass flow rate. Particles go where particles go. If you are unconcerned about the coupling of forces back onto the fluid, then you can freeze the flow field by setting NUMBER OF HYDRODYNAMIC ITERATIONS to 0, and inject particles on a single iteration using "any arbitrary particle mass flow rate". This will give particle trajectories independent of what the particles are doing to the fluid. Regards, Jeff |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mass flow rate: calculation v/s computation | beguxa | FLUENT | 5 | December 2, 2018 22:02 |
Target Mass Flow Rate | Nitin | FLUENT | 9 | June 17, 2017 11:30 |
2D axisymmetric mass flow rate for the plain orifice atomizer | jwillie2000 | FLUENT | 2 | September 17, 2010 06:43 |
negative global mass flow rate | Gimli | FLUENT | 0 | April 21, 2006 08:17 |
mass flow rate error | Masood | FLUENT | 0 | May 22, 2005 01:32 |