|
[Sponsors] |
June 9, 2018, 05:06 |
Water on top of Rigid Body during Decay Test
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello everybody,
I have some struggle with my CFD-Decay test. Like you can see in the pictures, there is more and more water on top of my rigid body (it's a box 60x30x15 cm). The natural period of the body is 0.9 s and in still water the freeboard is 5 cm. Only heave motion (translatoric y axis) is activated. There is no overtopping, because I just lifted the body 1 cm over its still water level. The pictures ar here: https://imgur.com/a/cg0eKJQ Uploading as attachment didn't work, because I have no permission?! Has anybody an idea how the water is getting on top of the RB? Thanks in advance, mavo |
|
June 9, 2018, 07:51 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
* Mesh too coarse
* Wrong advection scheme on volume fraction * Convergence not tight enough
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
June 12, 2018, 06:18 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello Glenn,
thanks for the reply. The Box is meshed with an Inflation-Layer with a thickness of first layer =0.4 mm and 25 layers in total. The boundary walls of the box are meshed with 4 mm and the maximum cell size is 2cm The advection scheme is high resolution and the time step size is 0.01s. Convergence is reached after ~3 iterations (max coeff. loops = 15). So, in my opinion, the mesh should be fine enough, as well as the time step size. But I'm not an expert I still have absolut no idea how the water is getting on top. I#M glad for any help, ideas or suggestions |
|
June 12, 2018, 19:52 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
Unless you have done a mesh sensitivity study and shown your mesh is adequate you should assume it is not adequate. Just because the mesh looks sort-of fine is not acceptable.
You should also check your convergence tolerance. Try a tighter convergence tolerance and see if it helps. The reason for the water on the top will be one or more of the reasons I stated before. So do checks on those parameters and work it out. And do not assume that because your settings look sort-of OK that is OK. Until you do a proper check using a sensitivity study you are just guessing.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
June 13, 2018, 05:16 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 9 |
Ok, thanks for you help, I'll check that.
|
|
Tags |
decay test, floating body |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
6-DoF Rigid Body Motion | jumpa72 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | March 1, 2024 03:38 |
Rigid body + remeshing error in redefining the rigid body updated-initial conditions | Pat84 | CFX | 27 | August 30, 2022 12:25 |
rigid body force | armin najarian | CFX | 5 | August 2, 2015 08:31 |
Time step based on rigid body velocity | Omran | CFX | 1 | May 31, 2015 20:27 |
monitor point on rigid body | ghoroobeaakhar | CFX | 0 | April 15, 2014 16:09 |