|
[Sponsors] |
Can CFX be used to achieve a passive motion simulation? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 25, 2018, 04:58 |
Can CFX be used to achieve a passive motion simulation?
|
#1 |
New Member
Klxing
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi everyone,
I want to simulate the motion of a turbine, Unlike tradition operation where we set a rotation speed,I want to achieve that , the rotation speed autamatically change according to the torque generated by the fluid field(a initial speed is given). I achieved this in Fluent with 6DOF model however it takes too much time, so I want to know can this be achieved in CFX? I have thought about using expresion to calculate the rotation speed, but I found that there is no method to get the torque and speed in the previous time step to determine the speed in current time. Is there anyway to achieve such simulation? Thank you all very much. |
|
May 25, 2018, 09:27 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
urosgrivc
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 11 |
Usualy you set up a fev simulations each having diferent RPM
than you plot a graph of (residual moment (load-result from simulation)vs rpm) vhere moment is 0 that is your RPM (as that would be steady state in real life) than you run a simulation at those rpms. there is something about this on the forum maybe if I find it I will post it here. I doo see that this could be automated by expresions. |
|
May 25, 2018, 09:32 |
|
#3 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,854
Rep Power: 144 |
This question gets asked many times - I should write an FAQ on it.
Getting the rotation speed from a 6DOF model is slow, difficult and tricky to set up. It is not recommended. A far better way of doing it is to run a series of speeds and output the torque from these simulations. Draw a graph of torque versus speed. Then draw the graph of your load versus speed. The point at which these lines intersect is the steady state operating point. This approach is MUCH easier and more reliable.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
May 31, 2018, 03:28 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
Klxing
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
Steady simulation has been conducted and I think there might be difference between steady simulation and actrual behavior, so I want to conduct the transient run. But as you said, 6DOF method is really slow, and very easy to become divergence when time step is big. Maybe this effort will result in failure....... |
||
Tags |
cfx;transient;6dof; |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is it possible add a passive scalar to an already finished simulation? | anon_q | OpenFOAM | 8 | April 3, 2018 04:06 |
External management of solid motion (using dynamicmesh) | maxou1993 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 28, 2015 12:37 |
Wrong Motion with CFX Worbench Remeshing | Bingus | CFX | 0 | December 11, 2014 04:42 |
Rigid body motion error when restarting a terminated FSI simulation | lingdeer | ANSYS | 1 | May 19, 2013 02:40 |
Boundary condition setting regarding turbine simulation using CFX | Lacerlacer | CFX | 11 | March 12, 2012 10:32 |