CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

2 inlets, 2 outlets. Assessment of flow rate ratio.

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 21, 2018, 06:47
Default 2 inlets, 2 outlets. Assessment of flow rate ratio.
  #1
Senior Member
 
Jiri
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 221
Rep Power: 13
Jiricbeng is on a distinguished road
Hello,

Lets assume a domain with two inlets A and B and two outlets C and D.
Flow rate is set on A and B, static pressure is set on C and D.

How to assess the flow rate ratio A/B through C and analogically A/B through D (how much of the flow rate from A goes through C and D and how much of the flow rate from B goes through C and D)? Is this even possible in single phase steady state analysis to assess?
Thanks a lot.
Jiricbeng is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2018, 07:28
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Yes, this can be done single phase and is quite easy to do. Set up an additional variable with a convection equation. Set the value of the additional variable to 1 at A and 0 at B. The value of the additional variable at the outlets will then tell you the ratio of A/B at each outlet.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2018, 08:13
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Jiri
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 221
Rep Power: 13
Jiricbeng is on a distinguished road
Thank you very much for the answer, however could you please describe that more detailed, please?

1) Which convection equation? How shall the expression for the additional variable look like?
2) How can I set 0 at a surface A, B? By "if" statement in the expression..?

Please explain it more detailed, I have no idea yet how to carry that out.
Jiricbeng is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2018, 08:28
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
I can't see a tutorial example to hand which shows how to set it up unfortunately. Have a look on the ANSYS customer webpage and see if you can get one from there. I won't have time to do a tutorial for you, if you can't find one you will have to read the documentation and work it out for yourself.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2018, 10:30
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Jiri
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 221
Rep Power: 13
Jiricbeng is on a distinguished road
Thank you very much for recommendation. I went through the tutorials and set the additional variable in CFX Pre. I set 1 on A, 0 on B. On C the value is 0.91, on D the value is 0.41. Obviously the sum C+D is not 1. Is it correct? What is the meaning of the numbers and what if I had ten inlets (A1, A2, ...A10), which numbers would I set ?
Jiricbeng is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2018, 13:02
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,928
Rep Power: 28
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
Did you check that the imbalances of your add.variable are within 1%? If so, then "what goes in" equals "what goes out". If this is the case, then the values should sum up to 1 (as long as you use Mass Flow Average quantities).



You can create a plot in the solver manager that shows you the imbalances. Most convenient. Alternatively you read the output file. In the bottom part, you can find the balances. Probably you are way off. Don't be mislead by the residuals. These are completely useless as long as your imbalances are not wihtin 5%.



My experience is that the additional variables converge much slower than the others. I usually go to Pre and set a specific timescale factor for the aditional variable (Solver Control>Equation Class> Additional Varaible >Timescale Factor =10 (or 100).
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2018, 20:13
Default
  #7
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Jiri, you are mistaken, C+D does not sum to 1. The values at the outlets simply say the proportion of fluid from A compared to the total fluid at that outlet. If you want to check the conservation of the additional variable you need to work out the mass flow rate of A at the inlet and outlet and check that balances.

Gert-Jan's comments about slower convergence on additional variables is correct, you should check the imbalances to check for this.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 22, 2018, 04:33
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Jiri
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 221
Rep Power: 13
Jiricbeng is on a distinguished road
Thank you both for the reply.
Well my question about C+D assumed converged solution of course (I know imbalances monitoring etc).
Yes you are right Glenn, the C+D does not sum to 1. C+D sums to 1 if defined inlet flow rate A and B are equal.

Please, what if I had three inlets, or more, such as A1, A2, A3 and two outlets B1 and B2? Which values of additional variable to set on the inlets A1, A2, A3? Shall it be 0, 1, 2 ??? Then, how to determine the flow rate ratio?
Jiricbeng is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 22, 2018, 05:24
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Gert-Jan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,928
Rep Power: 28
Gert-Jan will become famous soon enough
If you use a single additional variable, with 1, 2, 3, etc, on each inlet, mixing of these numbers will make it impossible to determine how much of each fluid goes to outlet B1 or B2. You need to set a new additional variable for each inlet. So ten inlets means ten additional variables (or maybe n-1). Only then you can trace where which fluid goes.
Gert-Jan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 22, 2018, 06:29
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Jiri
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 221
Rep Power: 13
Jiricbeng is on a distinguished road
Thank you very much indeed Mr. Jan-Gert !
Jiricbeng is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iteration number - flow rate relation helvas CFX 6 May 30, 2016 03:57
DPM total mass flow rate yow FLUENT 0 July 17, 2015 13:01
Split Mass Flow Rate in ANSYS CFX ashtonJ CFX 2 July 9, 2014 04:08
Ratio of eddy viscosity to molecular viscosity : Laminar or turbulent flow? JuPa CFX 7 September 9, 2013 08:45
Discrete Phase & Mass Flow Rate MagnusZeus FLUENT 0 December 2, 2011 18:57


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:55.