|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
HU Wenjun
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
When I run an immersed case, the solver give me the following warning:
| ********* WARNING ********* | | There are 1517893 interpolation points ( 33.42%) that are not | | properly mapped onto a source domain. This will likely introduce | | incorrect interpolated values for the CEL callback on the immersed | | boundary. If part of the immersed solid moves out of the fluid | | domain, please check the problem setup carefully. If part of the | | immersed boundary overlaps with fluid boundary, please break the | | immersed boundary into two or more boundaries, and use the CEL | | callback on a proper immersed boundary. If this is due to a slight | | difference in mesh, please increase the expert parameter "octree | | bndbox tolerance". ************************************************** ****** How I deal with the warning, ignore the warning or modify my model? do the warnings affect the accuracy of calculation result? Last edited by iphenix; March 20, 2018 at 20:38. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,816
Rep Power: 144 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My understanding is immersed solids do not handle properly where the immersed solid overlaps a wall boundary. So use the results with caution, check the results carefully before trusting them.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
HU Wenjun
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
Thank you for your answer.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
urosgrivc
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
It is usualy way beter to do imersed solid cases vith rigid body if posible.
there you can put inflation layers and other important mesh features for enhanced wall treatment. Imersed solid is quite (well wery) bad at values near or on the wals usualy nothing usefull comes out unles extremly fine global mesh is used, if your main result is a wariable on or near the wall try to make your simulation better. What is your case about? Last edited by urosgrivc; March 20, 2018 at 06:54. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
New Member
HU Wenjun
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
Quote:
There is an external flow and an internal flow that flows through the immersed solid at the same time. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,816
Rep Power: 144 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
An image would help.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
urosgrivc
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
And the error probably tryes to say that your solid has left the fluid domain.
this can easily hapen if conditions are vrong or constrains arent corect, wery easily infact. first few iterations-timesteps are very critical for only slightly constrained imersed solids. Forces which work on the body can be badly converged and huge numbers may accelerate the body out of the domain, check your results for what has happened. It totaly depends on the problem but physical timescale comes in handy in some cases like boat hull on a water surface if simulation is steady state. And yes a picture and explanation will help us help you |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
New Member
abubakar izhar
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
Dear
did you resolve this issue . Im trying to simulate vortex induced vibrations of a cylinder with immersed solid. Although ive used a fine mesh in fluid around immersed solid even then the error comes saying that 90% of nodes are not properly mapped. This warning doesnt show up when boundary tracking is turned off. Anyone has idea? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
urosgrivc
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
abubakarizhar try to use rigid body instead
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
New Member
abubakar izhar
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
Dear
I am already using rigid body. I am saying that warning message doesnot show up when boundary model is off but when modified forcing function is used warning comes with almost 90% of nodes not properly mapped right from the first iteration. one more thing my rigid body position is ok and its well inside the fluid domain then why this warning. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
New Member
abubakar izhar
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
| ********* WARNING ********* |
| There are 6904 interpolation points ( 81.19%) that are not | | properly mapped onto a source domain. This will likely introduce | | incorrect interpolated values for the CEL callback on the immersed | | boundary. If part of the immersed solid moves out of the fluid | | domain, please check the problem setup carefully. If part of the | | immersed boundary overlaps with fluid boundary, please break the | | immersed boundary into two or more boundaries, and use the CEL | | callback on a proper immersed boundary. If this is due to a slight | | difference in mesh, please increase the expert parameter "octree | | bndbox tolerance". | | Boundary Patch Name : RR | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ how can I increase the octree bndbox tolerance? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,816
Rep Power: 144 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
urosgvic is recommending you use moving mesh rigid bodies, not immersed solids. I do not agree with his suggestion, for this application immersed solids appears to be adequate and is much easier to apply than moving mesh rigid bodies.
I think the error message you are getting is because you have a large number of nodes of the immersed solid lying outside the fluid domain. You should check your model than the immersed solid lies entirely inside the fluid domain.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flow over a flat plate as an immersed solid | hamed.majeed | CFX | 4 | September 8, 2016 14:40 |
Error - Solar absorber - Solar Thermal Radiation | MichaelK | CFX | 12 | September 1, 2016 05:15 |
Immersed solid, vs solid-fluid interaction to determine forces on a submerged solid | amrbekhit | CFX | 0 | January 8, 2015 16:39 |
Immersed Solid Momentum Sources inside function | Martinw | CFX | 1 | October 10, 2013 17:14 |
CFX4.3 -build analysis form | Chie Min | CFX | 5 | July 12, 2001 23:19 |