|
[Sponsors] |
May 23, 2003, 10:47 |
cfx-windows 2000
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am running CFX5 in windows 2000,its very slooow,I thought I got the right spec when I got the machine,any one know how I can improve my run time ?
|
|
May 24, 2003, 08:49 |
Re: cfx-windows 2000
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi strudl You have no told the specifications of your machine.I had done the performance comparison of CFX5 on Pentium-4 with 1.7GH processor and 1 GB RAM , and on Silicon Graphics onyx2 machine. CFX5 is approximately 5 times faster on Pentium-4 as compared to onyx2 unix based machine. So I think windows based PC performance of CFX5 is very satisfactory. I dont think why you are feeling it slower.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comparison of fluent and CFX for turbomachinery | Far | CFX | 52 | December 26, 2014 19:11 |
[ICEM] Node Number vs. Node_ID & ICEM vs. CFX | Araz | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | April 25, 2011 12:03 |
CFX local parallel on windows XP | frank | CFX | 12 | April 24, 2008 08:26 |
windows vista anda cfx 11.0 | javi | CFX | 4 | November 6, 2007 21:36 |
CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 05:07 |