|
[Sponsors] |
problem defining material properties as a function of temperature |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 19, 2017, 11:52 |
problem defining material properties as a function of temperature
|
#1 |
New Member
ehsan
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi, i'm working on a 2D simulation which contains a sodium flow and it's properties are function of temperature. i used expression to define them but when i run the solver it returns with error code 1 and fatal error on material properties.
when i use other materials like ideal gas air there is no problem so i think the problem is with the material properties. i used these expressions: Density : ((1012 [K] )-(0.23*T))*1 [kg m^-3 K^-1] Dynamic viscosity : (88500 [K] - 94*T)*1 [Pa s K^-1] Specific Heat Capacity : (1499 [K] - 0.33*T)*1 [J kg^-1 K^-2] Thermal Expansivity : (20000 [K] + 10*T)*1 [K^-2] Thermal Conductivity : (112.1 [K] - 0.064*T)*1 [W m^-1 K^-2] and checked Temp.Extrapolation in material properties. it's 2D Steady State simulation with velocity inlet and pressure outlet and a fixed temperature wall Here is the file: http://www.mediafire.com/file/ygk5oo...ODIUM_FLOW.rar |
|
October 19, 2017, 16:01 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 1,188
Rep Power: 23 |
Looking at that viscosity expression, Wow!!! That is an incredibly high viscosity! 60 million times more viscous than water!
Your Thermal expansivity is WAY too high as well: 24000 [K^-1]!!!! You can plot your expressions in CFX pre to check if you have them right. but these are definitely not correct. Also: Thermodynamic inconsistencies can arise from defining both density and specific heat as dependent variables. Try making one of them constant. You don't need variable density and thermal expansion. the thermal expansion will be ignored and you will use the full buoyancy model instead if you define variable density. I'd make density constant, and just use the expansion for buoyancy (boussinesq approximation) |
|
October 19, 2017, 16:48 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
ehsan
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
it seems correct when i plot these expressions in cfx but when i use them to define the material even only one of them then the solver will give me error and won't start. i also tried to use constant values near these, the solver wouldn't give error but it converged so fast and actually it didn't solve anything and gave me empty data. |
||
October 19, 2017, 17:33 |
|
#4 |
New Member
ehsan
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 11 |
you are right, it was written 4.15*10^4 for viscosity in the article i found the properties from , but it should be 4.15*10^-4. i think that was the problem.
thanks |
|
Tags |
cfx, material error |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
Simple piston movement in cylinder- fluid models | arun1994 | CFX | 4 | July 8, 2016 03:54 |
is internalField(U) equivalent to zeroGradient? | immortality | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | March 29, 2013 02:27 |
Compile problem | ivanyao | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | October 12, 2012 10:31 |
Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue | Miguel Baritto | CFX | 4 | August 31, 2006 13:02 |