|
[Sponsors] |
October 18, 2017, 16:19 |
control volume and mash size
|
#1 |
Member
cfxtwophaseflow
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello
does the control volume of the space averaging in the Navier-Stokes equations in CFX defined as the control volume for the numerical discretization? In other terms do the control volume of the space averaging depends on the mesh size. |
|
October 18, 2017, 17:23 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,830
Rep Power: 144 |
Yes and yes.
The CFX documentation (theory manual) describes in detail how the control volumes are constructed from the mesh. |
|
October 19, 2017, 09:53 |
|
#3 | |
Member
cfxtwophaseflow
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
In my case, I'm simulating bubble column with the Euler-Euler approach with mean diameter 4mm. For very fine mesh when the control volume contains only air how cfx resolve the problem and how does he calculate the interfacial forces. And I think this is more absurd for the Euler-Lagrange model when the control volume is inside a bubble. |
||
October 19, 2017, 18:16 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,830
Rep Power: 144 |
In euler-euler models and euler-lagrange models the interphase effects are simply applied at the control volume level. There is no concept of phases becoming large enough that a full control volume would now be one phase or another.
For instance the drag of the bubble creates a force, and that force is applied to the control volume. But the size of the initial bubble is not used to work out whether the individual bubble affect one or multiple control volumes. It is simply the volume fraction field which is used to do this. So if you are looking for the effects of individual bubbles you need to consider higher resolution modelling approaches like free surface models. |
|
|
|