|
[Sponsors] |
September 4, 2002, 12:47 |
Fatal over flow in solver
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I'm modelling supersonic jet flows into still air. I have managed to get convergence of M = 1.41 (ideally expanded) flow into still air using a local timestep factor for the solver control in CFX 5.5 When i change the inlet pressure conditions in the results file from the previous simulation so that i can get an underexpanded or over expanded jet, the solver crashes with the error being a 'fatal over flow in the liner solver'. This error also comes when i use a new definition file with the old results file as an intial guess. Changing the local time step factor has not helped. The failure of the simulation is the at the 1st timestep. Any help to rectify this situation is most appreciated. regards N Menon |
|
September 4, 2002, 15:56 |
Re: Fatal over flow in solver
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Menon,
Your change in the boundary condition is probably too dramatic. Try making a series of small changes, or starting from scratch with the new condition. Furthermore, you should limit the use of a local timestep factor to getting initial convergence for your simulation. You should switch to a Physical or Automatic timescale and run to convergence before interpreting the results. Regards, Robin |
|
September 5, 2002, 07:43 |
Re: Fatal over flow in solver
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well heres the scenario. I ran the simulation for a M=1.41 jet (nozzle exit pressure equals ambient pressure, ideally expanded jet) using a local timestep factor of 10. the flow was convergerd to RMS 1e-04
Then i changed the timestep control to auto timescale in the results file from the previous simulation. the intermediate results show a totally different flow field from the semi-converged result (with local timestepping). The flow field shows the simulation (with auto timestepping) to be starting with the intial guess (not the results) for the local timestep simulation. Is there something i have missed with the intialization for the second simulation? Is there a numerical issue with using extreamly small timesteps in regions where the flow is many time sllwer than in other regions of the flow field, apart from the obvious that the flow field will take ages to converge? cheers nandu |
|
September 5, 2002, 11:02 |
Re: Fatal over flow in solver
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Nandu,
Make sure you selected the Automatic with Value option for initial guess and not the Value option. The Automatic with Value option tells the solver to use the existing solution if available, or the value you specified if there is no current solution. If you chose Value or Default, the solver will re-initialize the variables on restart. See the on-line help for more details. Regards, Robin |
|
September 5, 2002, 11:33 |
Re: Fatal over flow in solver
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thanks Robin, u've been a huge help
cheers nandu |
|
September 16, 2002, 08:19 |
Re: Fatal over flow in solver
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Nandu could you explain to me what the Local Time stepping Factor is ? I have read the on line manual and have managed to only confuse myself. Cheers Dave
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inviscid flow solver | luca_g | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | August 11, 2024 11:52 |
Suitable solver for Air/Air flow with different temperatures | cjm | OpenFOAM | 1 | January 20, 2011 05:17 |
Troubleshooting Unsteady Incompressible Flow Solver | dandalf | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 15, 2010 11:55 |
What solver to use for inviscid flow simulation over missile | mecbe2002 | OpenFOAM | 0 | April 27, 2010 12:10 |
Inviscid solver : separation of the flow | Jean-Marie Cavet | FLUENT | 1 | September 2, 2003 13:32 |