|
[Sponsors] |
July 17, 2002, 13:21 |
Linux v Win2000
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, I'm looking to get some info on the benefits of setting up our system to run Linux as opposed to Win2000. Is there any speed up in the every day running of CFX5 and how about when running in parallel ? Your thoughts are most appreciated, Cheers Bob
|
|
July 18, 2002, 03:46 |
Re: Linux v Win2000
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ask your vendor. I am pretty sure they have been running such comparative tests for our benefit.
|
|
July 22, 2002, 16:36 |
Re: Linux v Win2000
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It seems that both have advantages and disvantages. With Linux you have a more stable system than w2k. In CFX user point of view, a Linux machine makes some jobs to work better as in parallel cases. This is because Linux manage the partitioning of the job better than w2k. But with single process there's no big differences.
There are some facilities in CFX-Build that are not present in Linux version mainly in CAD funcionalities. Maybe there are many more specific features that work better in one than another. If you could test both systems it could be better. Goog luck Ribeiro |
|
July 26, 2002, 06:12 |
Re: Linux v Win2000
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ribeiro, cheers for the advice and information Bob
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dual Boot Windows and Linux and Go Open Source | andyj | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 21, 2010 17:49 |
How to install linux? | gholamghar | Main CFD Forum | 3 | July 22, 2010 11:40 |
Open Source, Linux, Visit, Code-Saturne,openFOAM.. | Ahmed | Main CFD Forum | 9 | October 18, 2008 11:20 |
Linux to Windows (dual boot system) | Alex | Main CFD Forum | 9 | May 3, 2007 04:36 |
Performance of fluent on win200 and linux | Seb | FLUENT | 7 | February 5, 2004 16:08 |