|
[Sponsors] |
April 4, 2002, 11:10 |
CFX-TASCflow Solver
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
In CFX-TASCflow manuals contains that the code has a multi-dimensional solver. However I work with some cases which are originally 2-D and I must use symmetry planes and put 2 elements (3 nodes) in the third direction. Is this really necessary? Or, can I solve problems only containing two spatial coordinates? Regards, cfd guy. |
|
April 5, 2002, 03:58 |
Re: CFX-TASCflow Solver
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think that if you use a single plane of elements you can't use the higher order advection schemes. LPS+PAC requires at least 2 (or 3?) elements thick.
Could you run your stuff in CFX-5 instead? It does not have this limitation because it's advection scheme is implemented differently. Neale |
|
April 5, 2002, 09:51 |
Re: CFX-TASCflow Solver
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Neale,
But I work with moving grids (usrgrd_point subroutine) and I don't know if CFX-5.5 has such a feature. However it would be great to work with moving grids with an unstructured grid, I believe that is much more easier than the structured grids used by Tascflow. In Tascflow, unfortunately I can't have control of nodes in a multi-block grid. cfd guy |
|
April 6, 2002, 00:38 |
Re: CFX-TASCflow Solver
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Nope, no moving grid in CFX-5.5. I guess your stuck with multiple elements thick + free slip walls for now then.
Neale |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
viewing cfx post while working on cfx solver manager | HMR | CFX | 5 | March 9, 2011 23:33 |
[ICEM] trouble with mesh quality from ICEM in CFX Solver | escher25 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | February 28, 2011 08:38 |
CFX SOLVER error !!! | mehrdadeng | CFX | 3 | November 23, 2009 17:42 |
CFX Solver problem | seojaho | CFX | 2 | October 14, 2009 15:33 |
CFX 5.7.1 PRE and solver won't start | daniel | CFX | 1 | January 20, 2006 11:09 |