|
[Sponsors] |
Using CEL-expressions to automatically set the physical timestep |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 29, 2017, 11:49 |
Using CEL-expressions to automatically set the physical timestep
|
#1 | |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 9 |
Actually im searching for a way to automatically change the physical timestep in dependency of the actual iteration step.
It should be something like: its <= 10: 1e-3 s 10 < its 100: 1e-4 s 100 < its: 1e-5 s Struggeling the forum search i found something which seems to be promising: Quote:
but unfortunately it doesnt work. Setting this as an expression for the physical timestep in CFX Pre the solver starts normally using the set timestep 1e-3 [s] but it doesnt change the timestep when the iteration levels are reached. Any idea what i did wrong? thanks in advance bastian |
||
April 30, 2017, 21:10 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,870
Rep Power: 144 |
You can also do this with a 1D interpolation function. I am a bit puzzled about how it did not work, however.
But looking at the bigger picture: I assume this is for a steady state simulation. Decreasing time scale size as you progress to convergence is not recommended. Usually you want to increase the time scale size. Why do you want to decrease it? |
|
May 1, 2017, 10:11 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
I also found the variable citern in place of aitern but it doest work either. For the the fact that the expression itself seems to work until it starts with the correct value set for the first ten iterations. Maybe during the run the expression is not evaluated correctly?! And yes you`re right, its steady state. To the more common things. The simulation itself is a double choking supersonic jet-pump, just to give you a little insight into the model itself. I'm not sure if its the right explanation until its one of my first bigger projects in cfx but i think you'll know what i mean. The first few steps, whilst CFX "fills in" the fluid into the domain i want to use bigger timesteps until i see no need to spend more time doing this. But as soon as the first shock regions occuring it becomes heavily unstable. But all in all it converges using a timestep small enough. So all in all i want to start with bigger timesteps to get quicker to the point i have to resolve finer. |
||
Tags |
cel, cfx, physical, timestep |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Timestep control via CEL? | Claudia | CFX | 7 | September 14, 2007 06:00 |
Physical timestep Calculation | Joe | CFX | 3 | July 4, 2006 16:07 |
Different Physical timestep for different domain | new@cfx | CFX | 0 | September 6, 2005 11:53 |
Physical Timestep | Ted Crilly | Siemens | 2 | February 18, 2003 05:05 |
CFX 5.5 | Roued | CFX | 1 | October 2, 2001 17:49 |