|
[Sponsors] |
July 16, 2001, 12:11 |
Three phase modelling
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Please Help with(CFX-4.3),
I am a new CFD user, i have been able to create geometry and command files and run the solver with 1-phase and 2-phases models. However, I now have problems with three phase, the third phase being particles with a volume holdup of about 5%. The problem is, if i perform check in set-up menu, I get an error mmessage that ">> OPTIONS PARTICLE TRASPORT HAS BEEN SET AND :>OPTION THE NUMBER OF PHASES 2 IS GREATER THAN 1 I had tried to ignore the message and when I ran the solver i got the error message that: INSUFFICIENT CHARACTER WORK SPACE, INCREASE THE SPACE DIMENSION. How do i increase the work space?? Why must the number of phases NOT BE GREATER THAN 1? Thanks in advance. Keny |
|
July 16, 2001, 12:59 |
Re: Three phase modelling
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello!
Two things: According to the manual you cannot have Lagrangian particles and multi-phase at once. Having deleted this option, if you increase your total character work space under SET LIMITS, it should be fine (see manual)... Herve |
|
July 16, 2001, 22:21 |
Re: Three phase modelling
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hello, everyone! If the .geo file has been done in BUILD module, you may not set the option at >>SET LIMITS. Please refer to page3-63 of the manual.
|
|
July 17, 2001, 11:28 |
Re: Three phase modelling
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all,
Dingding is right. Mine is a 'geo' file of Build module. I can not set limits as suggested by Herve. How does one specify the phses if you are dealing with solid particles, gas and liquid? Conventionaly that is a 3-phase system. CFX4.3 does not want to understand that. I believe their is a way out. Keny |
|
August 3, 2001, 07:46 |
Re: Three phase modelling
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
Page 3.63 says "In a normal run of the program using a geometry file obtained from a pre-processor, the size of the problem is set automatically from the size of the geometry, although occasionally extra work space will be required." In your case the extra work space seemed to be required. As to your 3 phase problem the simplest way out will be to define 3 phases, a continous liquid (1), a disperse gas (2), and a dispersed solid (3)phase. JohnR |
|
August 23, 2001, 12:38 |
Re: Three phase modelling
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
johnr,
thanks a lot John, I was a bit disappointed with cfd modelling so I took time out (off). After a rest I want to start again, now fresh. keny |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
alphaEqn.H in twoPhaseEulerFoam | cheng1988sjtu | OpenFOAM Bugs | 15 | May 1, 2016 17:12 |
Modelling Dense Phase Pneumatic Conveying of flyash | shubham208011 | FLUENT | 1 | October 18, 2011 03:30 |
Two phase modelling | Mamdud Hossain | FLUENT | 1 | August 19, 2003 04:04 |
compressible two phase flow in CFX4.4 | youngan | CFX | 0 | July 2, 2003 00:32 |
2 Phase Modelling | Kevan Moodley | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 2, 1999 11:35 |