|
[Sponsors] |
May 31, 2001, 06:01 |
Solid-liquid flow CFX-4 or CFX-5
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Now i have to study solid in liquid flow model. Please tell me, how do the diffence between using CFX-4 and CFX-5 for this type of model. Thank you
|
|
June 4, 2001, 22:07 |
Re: Solid-liquid flow CFX-4 or CFX-5
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The disperse multiphase modelling in CFX-5.4.1 uses the same implementation (at least from the standpoint of the modelled drag term) as in CFX-4. The main differences are in the numerics used to solve the equations. CFX-5 is a coupled hydrodynamics solver, eg: the two velocity fields and the pressure are all solved at once, and uses a cell-vertex rather than cell centred approach.
So, in many cases you will tend to get results much quicker with CFX-5.4.1 than with CFX-4 if the volume fraction for the disperse phase remains below about 20% or so. In most cases, if you are within these limits, then you should get similar, if not the same, results as CFX-4. Dan. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Extracting fluid flow region from a solid body 3D | Pradeep | Main CFD Forum | 6 | January 29, 2009 12:13 |
Define outlet with varying flow reistance in CFX | Coriolius | CFX | 1 | October 29, 2004 18:31 |
CFD of laminar reactive liquid flow | Ingo Meisel | Main CFD Forum | 5 | March 12, 2004 05:38 |
Plug Flow | Franck | Main CFD Forum | 3 | September 4, 2003 06:57 |
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (long) | DS & HB | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 8, 2000 16:00 |