|
[Sponsors] |
August 31, 2000, 13:51 |
Help with shock waves
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi there
We are using CFX-5.4 to simulate shock wave interactions at high Mach numbers (upto M = 3.2). Experimentally, the pressure in the test section of the wind tunnel is ~200 kPa. When setting up the Fluid Domain in CFX, a Reference Pressure must be specified. Also, for supersonic inlets a Relative Pressure must be entered when creating the Boundary Condition. The problem is this : The CFX-Solver crashes whenever the Reference Pressure is NOT set to atmospheric pressure (101.3 kPa). Thus, we cannot simulate the actual pressure in the test section. We've tried to set the Reference Pressure to 101.3 kPa and the Relative Pressure to 88.7 kPa, thus resulting in a pressure of 200 kPa, but this results in a "Fatal overflow in linear solver." Setting the Reference Pressure to 200 kPa and the Relative Pressure to 0 kPa also results in an overflow. Can anyone help ? |
|
August 31, 2000, 18:57 |
Re: Help with shock waves
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
(1). You need to find out whether the code is properly formulated for the supersonic flow at Mach 3.2. (2). Actually, the compressible flow is normally formulated using density-based , transient method. And is easier to compute than the subsonic flows. (3). I don't know what method is used in the code. It is likely that it is not formulated for the Mach 3.2 conditions. It is just my personal feeling. I could be wrong. (4). Were you able to find the Mach 3.2 applications in the vendor's website?
|
|
September 16, 2000, 19:16 |
Re: Help with shock waves
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It's always good to set your reference pressure, for compressible flows, to a ballpark value of what you expect. I'd go as far as to set the reference pressure to 200kPa and set your inlet pressure to 0 relative (if that is what you want). This is better for linear solver performance.
Linear solver overflows can occur for many reasons. Did you try simplifying the physics / boundary conditions to make sure you don't have a bad mesh? Dan. |
|
September 19, 2000, 12:24 |
Re: Help with shock waves
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Dan
Thanks for the help. Regards, Adam. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fluent and supersonic flows with strong shock waves | gera | FLUENT | 13 | December 15, 2015 06:21 |
CFX converge problem caused by shock waves | littlelz | CFX | 3 | August 17, 2009 10:35 |
Will compression waves overtake a moving shock? | GRA | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 19, 2006 01:24 |
HELP! Shock waves not heating up... | PattiMichelle | Phoenics | 0 | December 27, 2005 13:31 |
Normal shock waves | Fernando Velasco | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 6, 2000 15:10 |