|
[Sponsors] |
March 3, 2000, 06:31 |
SIMPLEC vs. PISO
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
I'm running a steady state incompressible turbulent flow problem and decided to try PISO instead of SIMPLEC and discovered that the oscillations in the residuals were reduced. Is there anybody that can support the conclusion that PISO might be more suitable for this kind of problem? (PISO was originally developed for transient compressible flow) Regards Andreas |
|
October 9, 2009, 09:02 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Prashant Gupta
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: IIT Kanpur
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17 |
for turbulent flows dont use simplec , use simple or coupled, u may get faster convergence it that
|
|
October 9, 2009, 10:11 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Lance
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 669
Rep Power: 22 |
Way to go, posting in a 9½ year old thread....
|
|
October 10, 2009, 06:56 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,872
Rep Power: 144 |
Especially one which has not applied to CFX for over 5 years. This post must be referring to CFX4 as CFX5/11/12 does not have SIMPLEC or PISO.
|
|
October 12, 2009, 02:49 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Prashant Gupta
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: IIT Kanpur
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17 |
oops, i dint saw the date, sorry, hhahahaha,
well till 9 i think there is simple and piso |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PISO 50 with discarge coeff down??? | Andrea | Siemens | 1 | February 1, 2008 14:33 |
Please Answer (PISO) | benedikt flurl | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 14, 2005 04:12 |
PISO - new questions | Benedikt Flurl | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 7, 2005 13:02 |
PISO vs. SIMPLE | benedikt flurl | Main CFD Forum | 2 | April 14, 2005 07:54 |
PISO vs. SIMPLEC | Andreas Abdon | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 4, 2000 03:18 |